06.02.2015 Views

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

Educability-and-Group-Differences-1973-by-Arthur-Robert-Jensen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Motivational Factors 215<br />

marked regular increase in clustering from trial 1 to 5, there was<br />

no increase across trials in the Negro group. It is impossible to<br />

account for the lack of a significant Negro-white difference in FRU<br />

<strong>and</strong> the marked difference in FRC in terms of differences in testtaking<br />

attitudes, motivation, <strong>and</strong> the like. The racial difference in<br />

this case is clearly attributable to the different cognitive processes<br />

involved in these tests.<br />

T ria ls<br />

Figure 15.2 Amount of clustering in free recall of categorized lists.<br />

There are other tests which do not look anything like the more<br />

usual type of intelligence tests but which in fact correlate with IQ<br />

<strong>and</strong> also show significant Negro-white differences. The Harris-<br />

Goodenough ‘Draw-a-Man’ test is an example. The child is merely<br />

led to believe this is a test of his drawing ability <strong>and</strong> is told to draw<br />

a man on a blank sheet of paper. The drawings are scored against<br />

age norms for their degree of maturity. We gave this test to classes<br />

of Negro <strong>and</strong> white pupils from kindergarten through sixth grade,<br />

removed all identification from the tests, <strong>and</strong> sent them away for<br />

scoring <strong>by</strong> an expert who knew nothing of the racial composition<br />

of the samples. At every grade there were substantial differences

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!