State Mission Mode Project e-district - Department of Electronics and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Study Report on Assessment of the Model e-districts motivation, if the team disintegrates before completion of the initiative due to reason such as transfer of team members. Hence the challenge would be to build a team for pilot project and then keeping the team for a period of atleast three years. The three years period was arrived at after considering the time required for various activities involved from project conceptualization, BPR, design, development and implementation. • Integration with existing and future systems Since departments are at varying levels of automation and have different types of applications implemented, the challenge is to integrate these departmental initiatives with the e-district project. • Horizontal integration with the other departments – Ensuring commitment Many line departments like transport, Food & Civil Supplies, Commercial Taxes, Revenue etc have either implemented or in the process of implementing their own departmental computerization project. To ensure commitment from the line departments is one of the biggest challenges. • Legal Changes for initiating the BPR For effective implementation of the e-district project process reforms are necessary, which in turn would require legal sanction and changes. However initiating and implementing legal changes is time consuming process and requires commitments from political and administrative authorities. 26
Study Report on Assessment of the Model e-districts V. Approach to e-district V.1 Evolving model This section presents an overview of the evolving model for the e-district, based on the learning’s of the visited districts by the project team. After the field visits, it can be concluded that none of the districts can be qualified as model e-district; however a combination of the best practices across these districts can be conceptualized as an implementation model for the pilot e- districts. The focus during implementation of the five districts visited was variant and different methodologies had have been adopted. The key factors, which had impact on designing different e- district models include: • Focus of the project champion (Front-End, Back-end, Middleware) • Availability of funds • Focus on workflow automation • Application deployment model • Decentralization of the functions( PPP models) • Selection of Application developer • Resources available for implementation( MPHS database) The figure provided overleaf presents an overview of the best practices of the model districts, details are provided further in the section. 27
Page 1 and 2: Study Report on Assessment of the M
Page 25: Study Report on Assessment of the M
Page 77 and 78:
Study Report on Assessment of the M
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117:
show all

State Mission Mode Project e-district - Department of Electronics and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?