Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$CQE=U]^\]Z: KAZAKHSTAN - OECD Online Bookshop$

Evaluating Country Programmes 106 UNDP (1997) (draft), Suggested guidelines for an end of term country programme or CCF evaluation. Michael Hopkins, OESP / UNDP: May 1997. World Bank (1999), OED Country Assistance evaluations – case study of the Philippines CAR. Gianni Zanini: January 1999. Other evaluation guides Hallam, Alistair (1998), Evaluating humanitarian assistance programmes in complex emergencies. RRN Good Practice Review No. 7: London: ODI. Maxwell, Simon (1996), “Apples, pears and poverty reduction: an assessment of British bilateral aid.” pp. 109-122 in Poverty, policy and aid: IDS Bulletin Vol. 27 No. 1: IDS 1997. Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs (1993), Evaluation of development assistance: Handbook for evaluators and managers. Norwegian Ministry for Foreign Affairs: Oslo. White, Howard 1996, “Evaluating programme aid (introduction and synthesis)” pp. 1-13 in IDS Bulletin Vol. 27 No. 4: October. Papers presented at the first (1994) Vienna Conference on Country Programme Evaluations Japan’s country programme Evaluation – Experience and future direction. Country programmes and country programme evaluations in Netherlands bilateral aid. Norwegian experience in country programme Evaluation. SDC (1994), Some experiences of Swiss Development Co-operation African Development Bank – country programming and country programme evaluation. Country programmes and country programme evaluation in the Finnish Development Cooperation. UNDP (1994), Country programme Evaluation in UNDP. World Bank (1994a), Country programme Evaluation Seminar, Vienna 1994 – Outline of World Bank presentation. World Bank (1994b), Country programme Evaluation Seminar, Vienna 1994 – the World Bank’s “new style” Country Assistance Reviews. OECD 1999
Summary OECD 1999 Chapter 3 Country Programme Evaluations (CPE) in the Netherland’s Development Assistance: The Case of Egypt by Jan Sterkenburg, Policy and Operations Evaluation Department Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Netherlands The Policy and Operations Evaluation Department has undertaken two sets of country programme Evaluations (CPEs), covering the following six priority countries, for the Netherlands’ development assistance: Bangladesh, Bolivia, Egypt, India, Mali, and Tanzania. The objectives of these two sets of studies were to assess the relevance, effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the bilateral aid programme. All CPEs covered the full period of bilateral development co-operation, i.e. a period of approximately 20 years. The studies had identical approaches and organisation. The report explains the methodology and main findings of the Egypt country programme evaluation. It includes some experiences with key workshop themes such as the methodology to aggregate findings at country programme level, partnership in the evaluation, and effects on the aid programme. Country programme level conclusions were pursued by clustering projects into five categories, by covering four of the five projects in the evaluation, which represented an average of 80 to 90% of disbursements in the selected sectors and 70% of all disbursements in the overall country programme over the period 1975-1996. Policy relevance focused on the orientation of aid activities towards the crucial development problems of Egypt, policy congruence between Egypt and the Netherlands, and the effects of Dutch aid on Egyptian policy. As there were little variation in the relevance assessments among sectors, aggregating findings at country level was relatively easy. 107
Page 1 and 2:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 3 and 4:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluating Country Programmes 4 The
Page 7 and 8:
Evaluating Country Programmes 6 SDC
Page 9 and 10:
OECD 1999 Glossary of Acronyms and
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 1 Co
Page 13 and 14:
Rationale, purpose and use OECD 199
Page 15 and 16:
OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluat
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
DONOR INFLUENCES Evaluation skills
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
13.00-14.30 Lunch break 14.30-15.30
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
OECD 1999 FINLANDE/FINLAND Ms. Eeva
Page 47 and 48:
OECD 1999 PORTUGAL Mr. Mario Mendes
Page 49 and 50:
Mr. Wolfgang GRUBER Director, Proje
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54: Evaluating Country Programmes 54 It
Page 55 and 56: OECD 1999 56 Mali . . . . . . . . .
Page 57 and 58: Evaluating Country Programmes 58 -
Page 59 and 60: Evaluating Country Programmes 60 po
Page 61 and 62: Evaluating Country Programmes 62 Bo
Page 63 and 64: Evaluating Country Programmes 64 -
Page 65 and 66: Evaluating Country Programmes 66 In
Page 67 and 68: Evaluating Country Programmes 68 Ti
Page 71 and 72: Evaluating Country Programmes 72 Re
Page 73 and 74: Evaluating Country Programmes 74 pe
Page 75 and 76: Evaluating Country Programmes 76 va
Page 77 and 78: Evaluating Country Programmes 78 (e
Page 79 and 80: Evaluating Country Programmes 80 Th
Page 81 and 82: Evaluating Country Programmes 82 ou
Page 83 and 84: Evaluating Country Programmes 84 Wi
Page 87 and 88: Evaluating Country Programmes 88 Ap
Page 89 and 90: OECD 1999 Appendix 2.3 Complete Lis
Page 91 and 92: OECD 1999 93 Complete list of known
Page 93 and 94: OECD 1999 95 Complete list of known
Page 95 and 96: OECD 1999 The CPE review instrument
Page 97 and 98: OECD 1999 Appendix 2.5 List of Dono
Page 99 and 100: OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluat
Page 101 and 102: OECD 1999 Checklist of questions (c
Page 103: Country programme evaluations - See
Page 107 and 108: Background OECD 1999 CPE in the Net
Page 109 and 110: CPE in the Netherland’s Developme
Page 111 and 112: OECD 1999 CPE in the Netherland’s
Page 115 and 116: Methodology OECD 1999 CPE in the Ne
Page 121 and 122: Evaluating Country Programmes 124 P
Page 123 and 124: Evaluating Country Programmes 126 G
Page 125 and 126: Evaluating Country Programmes 128 R
Page 127 and 128: Evaluating Country Programmes 130 3
Page 129 and 130: Evaluating Country Programmes 132 P
Page 131 and 132: Evaluating Country Programmes 134 Y
Page 133 and 134: Evaluating Country Programmes 136 N
Page 135 and 136: Evaluating Country Programmes 138 O
Page 137 and 138: Evaluating Country Programmes 140 p
Page 139 and 140: Evaluating Country Programmes 142 R
Page 141 and 142: Chapter 5 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 143 and 144: Country Assistance Evaluation in th
Page 145 and 146: OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 153 and 154: Traditional tools: relevance, effic
Page 155 and 156:
Measuring sustainability OECD 1999
Page 157 and 158:
OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 159 and 160:
Rating country strategies and assis
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
OECD 1999 Chapter 6 French Experien
Page 171 and 172:
OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 173 and 174:
OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 175 and 176:
French Experience with Country Prog
Page 177 and 178:
OECD 1999 Chapter 7 Issues for Coun
Page 179 and 180:
Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 181 and 182:
Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 183 and 184:
OECD 1999 Issues for Country Evalua
Page 185 and 186:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 8 Co
Page 187 and 188:
OECD 1999 Country Assistance Strate
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Country Assistance Strategies as a
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 9 Th
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Executive summary OECD 1999 Chapter
Page 213 and 214:
OECD 1999 Country Programme Plannin
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
OECD 1999 Chapter 11 Real Progress:
Page 229 and 230:
Real Progress: Fifty Years of USAID
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
OECD 1999 Real Progress: Fifty Year
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Assessment OECD 1999 Real Progress:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Sectoral successes: activities with
Page 257 and 258:
Evaluation of macro-level performan
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
OECD 1999 Appendix 11.1 Sectoral an
Page 271 and 272:
OECD 1999 Bibliography Real Progres
show all

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?