Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$CQE=U]^\]Z: KAZAKHSTAN - OECD Online Bookshop$

Evaluating Country Programmes 228 Source: Source: Authors. Figure 10.1. Revision/Planning country programme Bangladesh 1993 1994 August 1995 Evaluation Evaluation Ganges Documentation of Experiences: SDC, other donors, partners Analysis: Lessons learned, Potentials, Standards Conclusions: – What is feasible? – What is realistic? Trends, Trends, Visions Visions Jamuna – Socio-economic trends, – Scenarios – Vision “Bangladesh 2010” Documentation Conclusions: Synopsis paper Elaboration of draft Consultation Approval collection and exchange of a multitude of experiences, perceptions and opinions, expressed in a free, uncensored atmosphere. The outcome of these workshops relayed by, and carried forward through, phases of individual documentation work, reflection and informal discussions among core participants, was decisive in restructuring the country programme. The opening workshop, held on 9-12 May 1993, was attended by 30 participants, mainly Coordination Office staff and local partners. Facilitated by a representative of the Evaluation Service, it aimed at getting key people actively involved. It focused on the open or hidden rationale behind SDC’s development activities in Bangladesh (perception of frame conditions, potentials and limitations; how SDC is viewed by others; what values, norms and convictions guide SDC and its partners). OECD 1999
OECD 1999 Country Programme Planning and Country Programme Evaluation within SDC The workshop suggested that redefining role and composition of the Co-ordination Office – based on an analysis of actual functions (what are we really doing?) and functioning (decision-making, communication/information, management instruments) – should be one of the next steps. These topics were dealt with at a one-day programme officers retreat on 14 October 1993, at which programme staff of the Co-ordination Office participated. A self-evaluation workshop was organised on 14-16 November. This workshop, attended by the programme staff of the Co-ordination Office and the desk officer for Bangladesh at headquarters, pursued the purpose of evaluating the main project activities of SDC in Bangladesh on the basis of predefined and agreed criteria, proposing improvements, and drafting a first dynamic plan of priority sectors (phasing in and out, increase and decrease of focus), and vectors of activity for the coming 5-10 years. The question of clarification of responsibilities between the Co-ordination Office and headquarters, and how these responsibilities are perceived and assumed individually, was also taken up. Finally, on 18 May 1994, an information feedback workshop took place to inform the project partners about the progress of the review and provide them with the draft outline of the future co-operation concept. The partners were invited to give feedback on the rationale of the new programme and reflect on some crucial aspects. The workshop was attended by 35 participants (partners, resource persons, and Co-ordination Office staff), including SDC’s deputy director in charge of bilateral co-operation and the Chargé d’Affaires a.i. of Switzerland in Bangladesh. Conferences The elaboration of a vision benefited a lot from four lectures and talks given by thinkprovoking, visionary Bangladeshi to a selected audience drawn from the Co-ordination Office, the Embassy and project partners. The conference, by Dr. Hossain Zillur Rahman, a young researcher of BIDS, focused on poverty in Bangladesh. The renowned economist, Prof. Rehman Sobhan, was invited to talk about aid dependency and self-determined development. Prof. Mosharraf Hossain, another important economist, explained his own mediumterm development strategy centred around the dynamic forces of the domestic economy (small farmers, entrepreneurs of the informal sector). Dr. Kazi Faruque Ahmed, Executive Director of one of the largest NGOs, Proshika MUK, presented his vision on the potential role and limitations of NGOs in the development of Bangladesh. SDC regulations and guidelines The main reference document used for guidance was the “Leitbild” (strategic guidelines). It provided the criteria for the self-evaluation of the project activities and helped in selecting the priority vectors and sectors of the programme. Other important reference documents are SDC’s regulations (Weisung) on country programming and the draft of the medium-term programme of Section Asia I. Documentation To make the process transparent, the different steps were carefully documented. The design of the review was shown in a concept paper-Methods and results of the workshops were presented in short reports. Finally, a draft synopsis of the new concept was worked out and submitted to Section Asia I for comments and approval. 229
Page 1 and 2:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 3 and 4:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluating Country Programmes 4 The
Page 7 and 8:
Evaluating Country Programmes 6 SDC
Page 9 and 10:
OECD 1999 Glossary of Acronyms and
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 1 Co
Page 13 and 14:
Rationale, purpose and use OECD 199
Page 15 and 16:
OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluat
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
DONOR INFLUENCES Evaluation skills
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
13.00-14.30 Lunch break 14.30-15.30
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
OECD 1999 FINLANDE/FINLAND Ms. Eeva
Page 47 and 48:
OECD 1999 PORTUGAL Mr. Mario Mendes
Page 49 and 50:
Mr. Wolfgang GRUBER Director, Proje
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Evaluating Country Programmes 54 It
Page 55 and 56:
OECD 1999 56 Mali . . . . . . . . .
Page 57 and 58:
Evaluating Country Programmes 58 -
Page 59 and 60:
Evaluating Country Programmes 60 po
Page 61 and 62:
Evaluating Country Programmes 62 Bo
Page 63 and 64:
Evaluating Country Programmes 64 -
Page 65 and 66:
Evaluating Country Programmes 66 In
Page 67 and 68:
Evaluating Country Programmes 68 Ti
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Evaluating Country Programmes 72 Re
Page 73 and 74:
Evaluating Country Programmes 74 pe
Page 75 and 76:
Evaluating Country Programmes 76 va
Page 77 and 78:
Evaluating Country Programmes 78 (e
Page 79 and 80:
Evaluating Country Programmes 80 Th
Page 81 and 82:
Evaluating Country Programmes 82 ou
Page 83 and 84:
Evaluating Country Programmes 84 Wi
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Evaluating Country Programmes 88 Ap
Page 89 and 90:
OECD 1999 Appendix 2.3 Complete Lis
Page 91 and 92:
OECD 1999 93 Complete list of known
Page 93 and 94:
OECD 1999 95 Complete list of known
Page 95 and 96:
OECD 1999 The CPE review instrument
Page 97 and 98:
OECD 1999 Appendix 2.5 List of Dono
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
OECD 1999 Checklist of questions (c
Page 103 and 104:
Country programme evaluations - See
Page 105 and 106:
Summary OECD 1999 Chapter 3 Country
Page 107 and 108:
Background OECD 1999 CPE in the Net
Page 109 and 110:
CPE in the Netherland’s Developme
Page 111 and 112:
OECD 1999 CPE in the Netherland’s
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Methodology OECD 1999 CPE in the Ne
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Evaluating Country Programmes 124 P
Page 123 and 124:
Evaluating Country Programmes 126 G
Page 125 and 126:
Evaluating Country Programmes 128 R
Page 127 and 128:
Evaluating Country Programmes 130 3
Page 129 and 130:
Evaluating Country Programmes 132 P
Page 131 and 132:
Evaluating Country Programmes 134 Y
Page 133 and 134:
Evaluating Country Programmes 136 N
Page 135 and 136:
Evaluating Country Programmes 138 O
Page 137 and 138:
Evaluating Country Programmes 140 p
Page 139 and 140:
Evaluating Country Programmes 142 R
Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 5 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 143 and 144:
Country Assistance Evaluation in th
Page 145 and 146:
OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Traditional tools: relevance, effic
Page 155 and 156:
Measuring sustainability OECD 1999
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Rating country strategies and assis
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
OECD 1999 Chapter 6 French Experien
Page 171 and 172:
OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 173 and 174: OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 175 and 176: French Experience with Country Prog
Page 177 and 178: OECD 1999 Chapter 7 Issues for Coun
Page 179 and 180: Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 181 and 182: Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 183 and 184: OECD 1999 Issues for Country Evalua
Page 185 and 186: Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 8 Co
Page 187 and 188: OECD 1999 Country Assistance Strate
Page 191 and 192: Country Assistance Strategies as a
Page 203 and 204: Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 9 Th
Page 205 and 206: OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 211 and 212: Executive summary OECD 1999 Chapter
Page 213 and 214: OECD 1999 Country Programme Plannin
Page 223: OECD 1999 Country Programme Plannin
Page 227 and 228: OECD 1999 Chapter 11 Real Progress:
Page 229 and 230: Real Progress: Fifty Years of USAID
Page 233 and 234: OECD 1999 Real Progress: Fifty Year
Page 249 and 250: Assessment OECD 1999 Real Progress:
Page 255 and 256: Sectoral successes: activities with
Page 257 and 258: Evaluation of macro-level performan
Page 269 and 270: OECD 1999 Appendix 11.1 Sectoral an
Page 271 and 272: OECD 1999 Bibliography Real Progres
show all

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?