17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

<strong>Country</strong> Assistance Evaluation<br />

in the Multilateral Development Banks:<br />

Approaches, Instruments and Emerging Practices<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999<br />

by the Multilateral Development Banks –<br />

Evaluation Co-operation Group<br />

Introduction and questions on country assistance evaluation<br />

Most multilateral development banks (MDBs) have been making, and are continuing<br />

to make, considerable efforts to develop country strategies and programmes.<br />

This has not been the case for country assistance evaluation. The World Bank has<br />

taken the lead in this area, having completed 20 studies. The Inter-American Development<br />

Bank (IDB) has completed two pilot studies and the Asian Development<br />

Bank (AsDB) has recently completed its first study. The European Bank for Reconstruction<br />

and Development (EBRD), International Finance Co-operation (IFC) and<br />

African Development Bank (AfDB) have not yet begun the preparation of studies, but<br />

intend to do so in the foreseeable future.<br />

One of the first questions to address is whether institutions should undertake potentially<br />

costly country strategy/programme/assistance evaluations. At the 1994 DAC seminar on<br />

country programme evaluation (CPE), participants debated the purpose and usefulness<br />

of such exercises. For some agencies the purpose of the evaluation was to contribute<br />

to the examination and reorientation of co-operation policies independent of<br />

the outcome of projects. Others saw the evaluation as supplying answers to questions<br />

of results, cost-effectiveness and efficiency of ongoing projects on a cumulative basis.<br />

Others still questioned the usefulness of the exercise arguing that country evaluation<br />

fell short of sufficient detail on aid effectiveness to deliver a meaningful product. In a<br />

survey conducted at the seminar, the majority of participants considered that the CPE<br />

provided valuable lessons to improve future aid performance but some questioned<br />

whether it was worth the cost.<br />

Participants agreed that the starting point to country evaluations should be a<br />

formalised country strategy or programme. In the past, country strategies have<br />

often been intentionally formulated with very broad objectives and limited<br />

145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!