17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Introduction<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999<br />

Chapter 9<br />

The Anatomy of <strong>Country</strong> Assistance Evaluation:<br />

Case Study of the OED Philippines CAR<br />

by Gianni Zanini<br />

Operation Evaluation Department, World Bank<br />

When the Operation Evaluation Department (OED) began work on the<br />

Philippines in early 1997, our methodology for country assistance evaluations was<br />

still in its infancy. Five country assistance reviews (CARs) had been completed, and<br />

two others were underway. Since 1997, our methodology has evolved further and<br />

our range of products has expanded to include shorter, less resource-intensive<br />

country assistance notes (CANs). This chapter illustrates the process and methodology<br />

issues related to the Philippines CAR.<br />

The Philippines represented an interesting case. It was experiencing rising<br />

growth rates in the mid-1990s, but was a laggard with respect to the East Asian miracle<br />

economies. It was an early adjuster, but with hiccups in a difficult political environment.<br />

It had achieved a broad political consensus on a liberalised, exportoriented<br />

environment, but was still not a major recipient of FDI (Foreign Direct<br />

Investment). It still had a large Bank assistance programme, but Bank lending was<br />

diminishing due to large private capital inflows.<br />

The timing of our CAR was driven by the desire to influence the preparation<br />

of the next <strong>Country</strong> Assistance Strategy (CAS) by the Bank. The Philippines is on<br />

a 3-year CAS cycle, with a progress report scheduled in between. The Philippines<br />

CAR was due to be completed around the time of a progress report (early 1998),<br />

well in advance of the preparatory work for a full CAS (expected in mid-1999).<br />

Indeed, for maximum impact it is better to issue our country evaluations just<br />

before a CAS progress report rather than just before a full CAS. In the former case,<br />

CAS preparation takes place after the Bank has had a chance to absorb the findings<br />

and recommendations of the report and subsequent guidance from the Executive<br />

Directors based on the evaluation findings and the region’s presentation of<br />

a progress report. In the latter case, however, there is usually not enough time for<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!