17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />

232<br />

used available documentation on USAID programmes1 and Costa Rican development<br />

from 1945 through 1995. The records were incomplete for the early part of the<br />

period, however, and evaluations or project completion reports were often unavailable,<br />

even for recent periods. The researchers were also provided with summaries<br />

of interviews with about 100 Costa Ricans knowledgeable about specific USAID programmes,<br />

and 25 Americans who had worked for the Agency in Costa Rica. The draft<br />

sector studies were then reviewed at workshops in Costa Rica and Washington. The<br />

sector studies, listed in the Appendix, provide the necessary background and<br />

analysis for many of the conclusions in this report.<br />

It is impossible to adequately characterise the impact of an enterprise with so<br />

many diverse elements. Rather, the result of assistance was more a mosaic that<br />

emerged from the independent decisions of large numbers of people spread over<br />

decades. Some broad generalisations emerge from looking at this mosaic:<br />

– Assistance programmes were collaborative and well intentioned, and most<br />

achieved their intended purpose. Costa Rican economic and social progress<br />

was faster as a result of these efforts.<br />

– For the most part, USAID steered in the correct direction. The policies and<br />

orientations that were pursued were generally better than those already<br />

existing.<br />

– The most successful activities included the Inter-American Highway, which<br />

provided the backbone for Costa Rican transportation; collaborative rural<br />

health programmes, which produced spectacular successes and were<br />

adopted elsewhere; and the macro-economic reform programme of the<br />

1980s.<br />

– In retrospect, two large mistakes are evident: encouraging Costa Rica to participate<br />

in the Central American Common Market, with its strong trade barriers<br />

with other countries; and trying to enlarge governmental social<br />

programmes in the late 1970s, when an economic crisis loomed.<br />

– In these and other cases, USAID approaches improved over time. Lessons<br />

from past failures, in Costa Rica and elsewhere, were gradually incorporated<br />

into new projects.<br />

– Overall, US economic assistance to Costa Rica met both the developmental<br />

and the foreign policy goals it was intended to serve.<br />

Why foreign aid to Costa Rica?<br />

Official foreign aid is a post – World War II phenomenon. Before that, though<br />

the US Government sometimes provided temporary relief in response to both natural<br />

and man-made catastrophes, during most of US history, annual government<br />

appropriations for “charity” to other countries had been a foreign idea. Yet between<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!