17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Real Progress: Fifty Years of USAID in Costa Rica<br />

Politically, too, Costa Rica topped the list. Its democratic political system<br />

weathered economic crises of the 1970s and 1980s with no significant social conflict<br />

and no interruption of civil liberties or individual rights. While Costa Ricans, like<br />

democratic citizens everywhere, expressed dissatisfaction with various aspects of<br />

their political system, its resilience is a confirmation of Winston Churchill’s assertion<br />

that democracy is the worst form of government – except for all the others.<br />

Costa Rica in microcosm: two rural villages<br />

To provide a more tangible perspective on change in Costa Rica over the last<br />

half century, researchers for this study resurveyed two villages that had been<br />

studied extensively in the late 1940s. The two villages, San Juan Sur and Aquiares,<br />

are located in eastern Costa Rica near Turrialba. Though the two villages are culturally<br />

similar, San Juan Sur was originally populated by small farmers, while Aquiares<br />

is a hacienda, where families lived until recently in estate-owned housing and<br />

worked as employees.<br />

Economic changes<br />

Both communities prospered between the periods of study. In both places<br />

income and population rose. San Juan Sur was the more dynamic, with population<br />

rising 167%, compared with 34% growth in Aquiares. Potential for gainful employment<br />

in coffee production probably accounts for most of the difference. The coffee<br />

plantation in the area of Aquiares increased only moderately since 1950, because<br />

numerous coffee plantations already existed. In San Juan Sur, coffee acreage<br />

increased sixfold as farmers converted land previously in pasture, forest, or other<br />

crops. Part of this change reflects increased specialisation in coffee; farmers<br />

stopped growing vegetables for their own consumption and purchased them<br />

instead. While the increased area planted with coffee provided more employment,<br />

the determining factor in increased incomes was higher productivity in coffee. Yields<br />

quadrupled over the period. Coffee prices declined in real terms over the period,<br />

offsetting some of the yield gains, but a hectare of coffee produced about 2.5 times<br />

more in purchasing power in 1995 than it did in 1950. This is the approximate average<br />

increase in real wages and incomes of the people in the two villages.<br />

Thus, Aquiares and San Juan Sur prospered economically because they produced<br />

coffee more efficiently in 1995 than in 1950. They also prospered because of<br />

the extension of public utilities, such as water and electricity to their communities,<br />

and from improvements in health and education facilities. While per capita income is<br />

often used as the proxy for well-being, the link from some of the important welfareimproving<br />

developments to incomes is tenuous. Access to water and electricity was<br />

more affordable in 1995, but it was also dramatically cheaper in real terms because a<br />

public grid was in place. Much of the health improvement came from better treatment<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!