17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />

254<br />

Several factors induced USAID to raise funding levels in Costa Rica. First, the<br />

new Reagan administration was committed to considerably increased aid for Latin<br />

America, which it charged Democrats with ignoring. In this context, Congress<br />

regarded Costa Rica with substantial interest as the region’s leading democratic<br />

experiment. Second, and even more important, US opposition to the Sandinista<br />

government in Nicaragua led to efforts to support the rest of Central America<br />

against Sandinista expansion in the region. President Reagan and much of his Cabinet<br />

visited Costa Rica in December 1982 to pledge US support. In 1983, the President<br />

established a commission under Henry Kissinger to study Central America’s<br />

problems, which resulted in a 1984 report calling for a massive increase in US assistance<br />

to the region. A third factor in the high level of aid, which brought Treasury<br />

Department support, was heavy Costa Rican debt to US commercial banks. Costa<br />

Rica’s visibility as a debtor made the country important in maintaining the US strategy<br />

of promoting resumption of debt service wherever possible.<br />

After 1982, the programme’s purpose became macro-economic support. Nine<br />

annual Economic Stabilisation and Restructuring programmes provided US dollars<br />

to the Central Bank so that additional imports could be financed. This “programme<br />

financing” gave USAID an additional resource, local currency programming, which<br />

had been available only to a limited extent before 1982 (see Table 11.3). During the<br />

1960s and 1970s, most USAID resources had directly funded the planned activities:<br />

importing equipment, paying salaries, and covering other direct project costs.<br />

Financing in the 1980s was different.<br />

Table 11.3. Local Currency Programming, 1982-95 a<br />

In millions dollars – 1994 equivalent<br />

Sector Amount<br />

Health 9<br />

Education 32<br />

Population 0<br />

Environment 23<br />

Food and agriculture 78<br />

Economics/tradeb 664<br />

Infrastructure/housing 196<br />

Governance 73<br />

Regional agricultural school 122<br />

Other 72<br />

Total 1 268<br />

a) Mostly funds generated by sale of dollars provided for balance-of-payments support. These local currency funds<br />

were owned mostly by the Costa Rican Government, but were jointly programmed.<br />

b) Includes USD 337 million that was sterilised and USD 227 million for credit, much of which would have gone to<br />

agriculture.<br />

Source: Authors.<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!