17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />

70<br />

Box 2.2. Different Definitions of Evaluation Criteria<br />

Used in CPEs or CPE Guidelines<br />

Efficiency: “… concerns the organisation and management of the programme.<br />

With regard to organisation, the focus is on factors which influenced decisionmaking<br />

in the Netherlands regarding the composition of the programme. With<br />

regard to management the focus is on the capability to guide and monitor the preparation<br />

and implementation of development activities.”<br />

(Netherlands/India, 1994: 50)<br />

“… assesses whether the activities have been carried out efficiently in order to<br />

yield the project results. Have the means of the project been efficiently transformed<br />

through the project’s activities into the various project results? Could the<br />

same or similar results have been achieved at lower cost?”<br />

(EU Commission, 1995, reproduced in Maxwell et al. Ethiopia: 2)<br />

Effectiveness:<br />

“… the contribution to [the country’s] macro-economic self-reliance, poverty<br />

alleviation, and the sustainability of project results.”<br />

(Netherlands/India, 1994: 50)<br />

Relevance:<br />

“… refers to how the project or the programme is related to the poverty profile<br />

and the scope for interventions identified.”<br />

(Danida/Nepal, 1995: 58)<br />

Sustainability:<br />

“… is judged from the way in which institutional arrangements are made to<br />

ensure a lasting impact on poverty alleviation”<br />

(Danida/Nepal, 1995: 58)<br />

One of the most extensive discussions of sustainability in the particular context<br />

of technical assistance is provided by UNDP:<br />

“Technical assistance, especially in TA projects, is an imprecise and variable<br />

state. It can be gained or lost as a result of changes in government policies or imperatives<br />

or through technical advances or obsolescence. It is, therefore, more often a<br />

promise than a fact; an expression of expectations at the time the judgement is<br />

made…<br />

“Technical assistance is an instrument of change. That change begins in the<br />

minds of men [sic], through education and training. For that change to endure and<br />

prosper, it needs to be institutionalised… A development project is said to have<br />

reached the threshold of sustainability when its objectives have been fully<br />

achieved, essential trained staff are appointed on a permanent basis, and all<br />

project equipment is functioning well with sound maintenance practices in place.”<br />

(UNDP/Myanmar, 1994: 53-55)<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!