Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />
64<br />
– In many cases a donor will use CPEs as an input to an agency-wide review of its<br />
goals, methods and achievements. Danida and more recently DFID have combined<br />
country programme evaluation with an attempt to evaluate the effectiveness<br />
of various aid instruments with regard to the global goal of poverty<br />
reduction. (The result is more recognisably a CPE in the case of the Danida<br />
reports.) The EU, similarly, has commissioned six short CPEs as “part of a general<br />
evaluation of EU aid… [focusing on] policy formulation, policy dialogue<br />
between the EC and individual ACP states, and aid implementation and<br />
management” (EU/Zimbabwe 1998: Preamble). In some cases, the CPE may be<br />
used to judge the value of country programming itself: one of the three objectives<br />
of the Norwegian evaluation of co-operation with Nicaragua was “to<br />
assess to what extent the [country] strategy has been conducive in giving<br />
guidance and served as a management tool” (Norway/Nicaragua, 1998: 9).<br />
The boundaries between these rationales are not clearly demarcated and most<br />
CPEs are designed to evaluate more than one level of goals. There are some CPEs<br />
which are designed primarily to provide input to an agency-level review of goals<br />
and approaches but which may also be of value to the country programme manager.<br />
Others are designed as documents related first and foremost to the country planning<br />
and implementation cycle, but may nonetheless be drawn upon in headquarters<br />
reviews of aid management and performance. The multiple rationales of most<br />
CPEs are apparent from Table 2.2.<br />
Nature of goals<br />
Table 2.2. Nature or level of the goals evaluated in CPEs<br />
Number of CPEs<br />
Number %<br />
Individual project goals 22 88<br />
<strong>Country</strong> programme goals 25 100<br />
Agency-wide goals 8 33<br />
Source: Authors.<br />
Relationship to learning and planning: historical and forward-looking CPEs<br />
The second axis by which a CPE could be classified provides a continuum from<br />
historical to forward-looking evaluations. Here, the rationale question is: “Is the<br />
CPE intended primarily to identify and explain past performance, or to provide concrete<br />
recommendations in order to improve future performance?” At one extreme<br />
<strong>OECD</strong> 1999