Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$CQE=U]^\]Z: KAZAKHSTAN - OECD Online Bookshop$

20-22.01.98 24.01- 22.02.98 30 March- 3 April 98 1-2 day(s) beginning May (week 4-8.05.98) End June End September End 1998 Source: Source: Authors. OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluations Workshop: The Case of Tanzania Figure 4.1. Journey through Tanzania Elaboration of the “Country Programme 1999-2005” Assessment background External evaluation of specific aspects of CP Review/ Assesment of CP/ Sectors/ Progr./Projects Outline of future CP Chalinze Dar-es-Salaam Mbeya 3 d WS Iringa Mikumi Morogoro 5 d WS Synopsis paper of CP for discussion Steering Group: – Desk Officer Tanzania at HQs SDC (SOC) – National Program Officer NPO (CL) – Coordinator/Head SDC Tanzania (ZG) Segera Arusha Moshi Comparison Summary/Outlook of two approaches and adjustment of CP 1 d WS 1. Draft of CP Final Draft of CP Approval of the “CP 1999-2005” Elaboration of a Vision “Tanzania in 2015” Vision WS 1 d WS 129
Evaluating Country Programmes 130 3rd Workshop (Vision 2015) Four eminent Tanzanians from political, public and private circles were invited to define their visions of Tanzania in the year 2015. The results were used as a basis to enable the SDC to orient its future programme of cooperation in a constructive and practical manner. 4th Workshop (Outlook) Objectives: To define the frame, goals, objectives and strategies of the CP 1999-2003; to define a conceptual framework and plan resources allocation; and to define a set of indicators, risks and assumptions for monitoring of the new CP. Level of participation: – Local partners and project staff at district, regional and central levels were involved in the first three workshops. – Beneficiaries or stakeholders at grass-roots level were not involved in the process. They were broadly represented, in the second workshop only, by a representative of civil society through one NGO umbrella organisation. – Other like-minded donors were consulted during the external evaluation process. – The participatory process was designed to give the present CP a solid base of ownership, common partnership and a good chance of long-term sustainability. The three participatory workshops also assured Tanzanian partners that the SDC wanted to reach a commonly defined goal for the next CP. The SDC’s views on the process and outcome: – Enhanced local ownership and partnership spirit: The chosen participatory approach was a remarkable departure from the previous entirely non-local participatory process. This initiative was highly commended by our local partners as they felt they could participate substantially in the CP 1999-2003. – Enhanced team spirit among the SDC staff members. – Enhanced synergies, cross-exchange of ideas and comprehension within sectoral programmes of SDC support in Tanzania. – A time-consuming and expensive exercise: The exercise took too long, more than a year from start to finish. This was due in part to unrealistic timing of key events in the process from external evaluation to elaboration of the new CP. Length of time for future, similar exercises should be taken into account. Sector-wide participation: Programme beneficiaries such as road users and health service users were not adequately consulted. Likewise, consultation with other donors, to get their perception of Tanzania’s development context, and information about their activities and medium-term programmes, would have been helpful. However, this could not be done, also due to inadequate timing of events. OECD 1999
Page 1 and 2:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 3 and 4:
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERAT
Page 5 and 6:
Evaluating Country Programmes 4 The
Page 7 and 8:
Evaluating Country Programmes 6 SDC
Page 9 and 10:
OECD 1999 Glossary of Acronyms and
Page 11 and 12:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 1 Co
Page 13 and 14:
Rationale, purpose and use OECD 199
Page 15 and 16:
OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluat
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
DONOR INFLUENCES Evaluation skills
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
13.00-14.30 Lunch break 14.30-15.30
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
OECD 1999 FINLANDE/FINLAND Ms. Eeva
Page 47 and 48:
OECD 1999 PORTUGAL Mr. Mario Mendes
Page 49 and 50:
Mr. Wolfgang GRUBER Director, Proje
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Evaluating Country Programmes 54 It
Page 55 and 56:
OECD 1999 56 Mali . . . . . . . . .
Page 57 and 58:
Evaluating Country Programmes 58 -
Page 59 and 60:
Evaluating Country Programmes 60 po
Page 61 and 62:
Evaluating Country Programmes 62 Bo
Page 63 and 64:
Evaluating Country Programmes 64 -
Page 65 and 66:
Evaluating Country Programmes 66 In
Page 67 and 68:
Evaluating Country Programmes 68 Ti
Page 69 and 70:
Evaluating Country Programmes 70 Bo
Page 71 and 72:
Evaluating Country Programmes 72 Re
Page 73 and 74:
Evaluating Country Programmes 74 pe
Page 75 and 76: Evaluating Country Programmes 76 va
Page 77 and 78: Evaluating Country Programmes 78 (e
Page 79 and 80: Evaluating Country Programmes 80 Th
Page 81 and 82: Evaluating Country Programmes 82 ou
Page 83 and 84: Evaluating Country Programmes 84 Wi
Page 85 and 86: Evaluating Country Programmes 86 Bo
Page 87 and 88: Evaluating Country Programmes 88 Ap
Page 89 and 90: OECD 1999 Appendix 2.3 Complete Lis
Page 91 and 92: OECD 1999 93 Complete list of known
Page 93 and 94: OECD 1999 95 Complete list of known
Page 95 and 96: OECD 1999 The CPE review instrument
Page 97 and 98: OECD 1999 Appendix 2.5 List of Dono
Page 99 and 100: OECD 1999 Country Programme Evaluat
Page 101 and 102: OECD 1999 Checklist of questions (c
Page 103 and 104: Country programme evaluations - See
Page 105 and 106: Summary OECD 1999 Chapter 3 Country
Page 107 and 108: Background OECD 1999 CPE in the Net
Page 109 and 110: CPE in the Netherland’s Developme
Page 111 and 112: OECD 1999 CPE in the Netherland’s
Page 115 and 116: Methodology OECD 1999 CPE in the Ne
Page 121 and 122: Evaluating Country Programmes 124 P
Page 123 and 124: Evaluating Country Programmes 126 G
Page 125: Evaluating Country Programmes 128 R
Page 129 and 130: Evaluating Country Programmes 132 P
Page 131 and 132: Evaluating Country Programmes 134 Y
Page 133 and 134: Evaluating Country Programmes 136 N
Page 135 and 136: Evaluating Country Programmes 138 O
Page 137 and 138: Evaluating Country Programmes 140 p
Page 139 and 140: Evaluating Country Programmes 142 R
Page 141 and 142: Chapter 5 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 143 and 144: Country Assistance Evaluation in th
Page 145 and 146: OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 153 and 154: Traditional tools: relevance, effic
Page 155 and 156: Measuring sustainability OECD 1999
Page 159 and 160: Rating country strategies and assis
Page 169 and 170: OECD 1999 Chapter 6 French Experien
Page 171 and 172: OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 173 and 174: OECD 1999 French Experience with Co
Page 175 and 176: French Experience with Country Prog
Page 177 and 178:
OECD 1999 Chapter 7 Issues for Coun
Page 179 and 180:
Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 181 and 182:
Issues for Country Evaluation: The
Page 183 and 184:
OECD 1999 Issues for Country Evalua
Page 185 and 186:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 8 Co
Page 187 and 188:
OECD 1999 Country Assistance Strate
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Country Assistance Strategies as a
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Introduction OECD 1999 Chapter 9 Th
Page 205 and 206:
OECD 1999 Country Assistance Evalua
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Executive summary OECD 1999 Chapter
Page 213 and 214:
OECD 1999 Country Programme Plannin
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
OECD 1999 Chapter 11 Real Progress:
Page 229 and 230:
Real Progress: Fifty Years of USAID
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
OECD 1999 Real Progress: Fifty Year
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Assessment OECD 1999 Real Progress:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Sectoral successes: activities with
Page 257 and 258:
Evaluation of macro-level performan
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
OECD 1999 Appendix 11.1 Sectoral an
Page 271 and 272:
OECD 1999 Bibliography Real Progres
show all

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?