17.11.2012 Views

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />

160<br />

When preparing country evaluations, institutions should report on progress achieved in the<br />

country on cross-cutting concerns of poverty reduction, gender equity, governance and the environment.<br />

If projects are directly earmarked for these concerns, assessment can be made of their efficacy.<br />

Poverty reduction<br />

The issue of poverty reduction is raised in the country strategies of many MDBs<br />

these days. The World Bank uses a wide range of instruments in the strategies to<br />

support efforts to reduce poverty – efficient and broad-based economic growth,<br />

access by the poor to health care and education, urban and rural development targeted<br />

on the poor, access of the poor to credit, the development of infrastructure<br />

in poor areas and policy dialogue. The World Bank recommends that each of its<br />

CASs i) include a coherent diagnosis of poverty based on recent analysis,<br />

ii) develop special indicators and benchmarks for evaluating poverty outcomes and<br />

an information strategy to monitor results at both the project and country levels,<br />

and iii) include a poverty strategy which involves a high degree of participation of<br />

the poor and marginalised in its preparation. These efforts to build a poverty reduction<br />

strategy into the CAS and include indicators and benchmarks should greatly<br />

facilitate the evaluation of the Bank’s efforts in this area.<br />

The World Bank’s CARs and CANs have provided little focus so far on the poverty<br />

reduction agenda of the Bank. The Bolivia CAR reported that the Bank’s three<br />

social fund projects in the country appear to have been regressive because they<br />

provided the poorest provinces with far less resources than the less poor ones. The<br />

Bangladesh CAR noted that while considerable progress has been made in improving<br />

the general well-being of the population through reduced infant mortality,<br />

increased life expectancy and increased caloric intake, large segments of the population<br />

still live in very poor conditions. The Ecuador CAN examined the CAS objective<br />

to alleviate poverty, noting that the condition of the poor deteriorated over the<br />

period in question, that targeted loans represented only a small portion of the total<br />

and that the borrower was unable or unwilling to invest in a meaningful social safety<br />

net. Greater efforts are being made to include poverty reduction in recent studies<br />

such as the Sri Lanka CAN.<br />

Efforts to build poverty reduction objectives with accompanying targets, indicators<br />

and benchmarks into country strategies would facilitate evaluation efforts in<br />

this area. In situations where the strategy does not address poverty reduction<br />

objectives, country assistance evaluations can still relate project success and other<br />

progress (or lack of progress) in this area.<br />

Gender equity<br />

The issue of gender equity – differences in economic and social indicators –<br />

income, wealth, education, nutrition and access to services and resources – is<br />

<strong>OECD</strong> 1999

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!