Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Evaluating</strong> <strong>Country</strong> <strong>Programmes</strong><br />
112<br />
The country programme evaluation of Egypt<br />
<strong>Country</strong> programme evaluations: some general characteristics<br />
The Policy and Operations Evaluation Department (IOB) embarked upon a first<br />
series of country programme evaluations in 1991. This series dealt with the bilateral<br />
development assistance programmes with India, Mali and Tanzania. The respective<br />
reports, together with a fourth report containing the main findings and summaries<br />
of the three country cases, and a synthesis of common issues on aid management<br />
were submitted by the Minister for Development Co-operation to Parliament in<br />
mid-1994. In 1995, IOB started a second series of country programme evaluations<br />
including the aid programmes for Bangladesh, Bolivia and Egypt.<br />
The objective of both sets of studies was to assess the policy relevance, effectiveness,<br />
efficiency and sustainability of the results of the bilateral aid programme<br />
with the respective countries. All CPEs covered the full period of the bilateral<br />
development co-operation, i.e. a period of about twenty years. The studies had an<br />
identical approach and organisation. The evaluation started with an inventory of all<br />
activities (projects, programme aid, etc.) financed under the programme; subsequently<br />
the various activities were clustered into sectors. A number of sectors were<br />
selected for detailed evaluation, including field studies. Separate analyses were<br />
made of commodity import support, debt relief and other forms of macro-economic<br />
support. These studies and the evaluations of project aid in the selected sectors were<br />
carried out by teams of independent researchers and consultants involving expatriate<br />
and local evaluators. Each country programme evaluation was co-ordinated by an<br />
IOB staff member and one external adviser, who together were responsible for writing<br />
the final report.<br />
The second set of CPEs differed from the first in several respects. Following the<br />
further integration of development co-operation into foreign policy, the aid effort<br />
was placed in the context of the overall bilateral relations between the Netherlands<br />
and the recipient country. Moreover, greater attention was paid to two priority<br />
themes of the Netherlands’ development assistance: environment and the role of<br />
women in development, and the dynamics of the programme during the period<br />
under review. Furthermore, all three CPEs included perception studies to assess<br />
how Dutch aid was perceived by the local communities.<br />
Finally, the recipient countries were more closely involved in the evaluation<br />
process. This involvement took different forms in the three countries; the main difference<br />
being that there were advisory groups in the recipient countries for the<br />
Bolivian and Egyptian CPEs, whereas feedback in Bangladesh was organised<br />
through sectoral and programme-level seminars. For all three countries, an official<br />
reaction was included in the final report. Conversely, aid management in a generic<br />
sense was omitted as a specific theme since it received ample attention in the<br />
previous series of CPEs, and recent changes in the organisation of the Ministry of<br />
<strong>OECD</strong> 1999