Evaluating Country Programmes - OECD Online Bookshop

Evaluating Country Programmes
214
How it fits with overall Bank strategy for country.
Consistent/right tools (amount and mix of resources) used to meet objectives.
– Implementation (efficiency)
Bank "actions" (loans, technical assistance, other).
What obstacles were experienced during implementation (if any).
How could implementation have been better.
Role of the resident mission (anything relevant to say about past, current
or future).
Effective partnership with government.
Dissemination of Bank ESW, strategy, project information.
– Co-ordination with other donors/NGOs
Has there been effective co-ordination among donors.
Which areas would have benefited from better aid co-ordination.
Effective participatory approach (with NGOs).
– Outcome of Bank’s assistance (efficacy)
Evaluation of whether strategic objectives were met.
Who should get the credit (luck; Bank; government; other players such as
IMF, AsDB, Japan?).
– Overall sectoral evaluation (or at the subsectoral levels, if appropriate)
Short paragraph
Table (please fill in)
Highly Unsatisfactory/Satisfactory
Bank’s role
Borrower’s role
Outcome of Bank’s assistance
– Agenda for future action (should work in sector continue? If so how?)
Lessons for future assistance to the country and to other countries.
OECD 1999