18.06.2015 Views

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Task D – Assess Need for New / Updated <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Mapping<br />

The objective of this project task is the identification of communities vulnerable to flooding that<br />

should be considered for new or updated flood risk mapping studies. This assessment has been<br />

founded on the updated <strong>Flood</strong> Events Inventory, the re-assessment of <strong>Flood</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> Maps, a<br />

detailed review of the technical components comprising the existing flood plain maps <strong>and</strong><br />

linkage of a variety of datasets relevant to flood risk assessment.<br />

The definition of communities has been based on the Local Government Profile (LGP) number<br />

dataset (XLS file with no spatial referencing). This unique number is assigned to each<br />

community in Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Labrador although a few communities do not have a number.<br />

A second dataset of communities in Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> was obtained from Government of<br />

Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Labrador, Department of Municipal Affairs, Municipal Planning <strong>and</strong> Design<br />

Engineering Division. This dataset was used to establish spatial locations of the communities<br />

but did not include an LGP number. Linkage with the LGP number dataset was completed<br />

through comparison of community name.<br />

Please note for Task D the names used for communities <strong>and</strong> areas are a combination of those<br />

that were in place when the FRM studies were done in the 1980s <strong>and</strong> 1990s <strong>and</strong> those reflected<br />

by the new LGP numbers due to a need to use data from both old FRM studies <strong>and</strong> the LGP<br />

list.<br />

The assessment of some communities has been limited by lack of data which has also impacted<br />

linkage to other datasets such as census data from Statistics Canada. To ensure that<br />

communities were adequately considered in the overall assessment, the prioritization followed a<br />

multi-tiered approach. Factors included in the assessment are outlined below:<br />

4.1 Prioritization Parameters<br />

4.1.1 Age of flood study<br />

The age of flood plain mapping may be a sufficient trigger to initiate a re-mapping exercise.<br />

<strong>Flood</strong> plains maps will typically be re-evaluated after about 20 years. However, it is<br />

recommended that flood risk maps be updated whenever IDF relationships are updated. IDF<br />

relationships form the basis for hydrologic modeling which is one of the two fundamental<br />

elements of a flood risk assessment; the other being hydraulic assessment. The Canadian<br />

TA1112733 page 94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!