18.06.2015 Views

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development of <strong>Project</strong>ed Intensity-Duration-Frequency Curves<br />

for Corner Brook <strong>and</strong> Goulds/Petty Harbour, Newfoundl<strong>and</strong> May 16, 2012<br />

4.4 Use of Composite Historical IDF for St. John’s Area<br />

A second set of historical IDF curves were used to project IDF values for the St. John’s<br />

area. This was done to account for a large precipitation event that took place in 2002,<br />

after the St. John’s A station was taken offline. In order to include the effect of this<br />

storm, data from the St. John’s A station with data was combined from a station at<br />

Windsor Lake, approximately 1.6 kilometer from the St. John’s A station (updated data<br />

provided by WRMD). The record for the St. John’s A station runs from 1949 through<br />

1996, <strong>and</strong> the record for the Windsor Lake station runs from 1999 through 2010. The<br />

combined record from these two stations is referred to as the St. John’s Composite.<br />

It is important for any analysis of extreme events that all large storms are taken into<br />

account, though any analyst should exercise caution combining data from multiple<br />

stations. Without a significant period of overlap in the data record for two gauges, no<br />

accurate assumptions can be made about the homogeneity of the data recorded by the<br />

gauges. There are a number of reasons that a single gauge with a long record provides<br />

much higher-quality data than a composite dataset from multiple gauges:<br />

- If two gauges are placed in separate climatic zones, different elevations or regions<br />

with varying l<strong>and</strong> cover, they may not experience the same storms.<br />

- Even if two stations are in close proximity they may return very different results for<br />

the same storm because, during precipitation events, rainfall is not deposited in a<br />

spatially uniform manner.<br />

- There are many environmental factors that can impact the measurements taken by<br />

a precipitation gauge including proximity to buildings, localized wind patterns, <strong>and</strong><br />

local obstructions.<br />

- Gauges of the same type may not be calibrated in an identical way or maintained to<br />

the same st<strong>and</strong>ard of operation.<br />

The projected IDFs in this report are developed based on the baseline historical IDFs at<br />

both the Environment Canada St. John’s A site <strong>and</strong> for the St. John’s Composite<br />

record.<br />

4.5 Fitting Models<br />

For this work the generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution was fit to the historical<br />

monthly precipitation maxima using potential predictor variables. The GEV distribution<br />

can assume three possible distribution types, known as the Gumbel, Fréchet <strong>and</strong><br />

Weibull. The Gumbel is the distribution used by Environment Canada to estimate IDF<br />

curves <strong>and</strong> it is a relatively ―light-tailed‖ distribution with a fixed shape. Using the<br />

Frechet variant of the GEV would allow a model to be fit to the shape parameter, which<br />

AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!