18.06.2015 Views

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Drainage<br />

Attribute<br />

Meaning<br />

Hydrologic Soil Group<br />

- Not applicable not applicable<br />

VR Very rapidly drained A<br />

R Rapidly drained A<br />

W Well drained A<br />

MW Moderately well drained B<br />

I Imperfectly drained C<br />

P Poorly drained D<br />

VP Very poorly drained D<br />

Table 4-4. Drainage Attribute to Hydrologic Soil Class Relationship<br />

Weighting Group Description<br />

0 A Soils in this group have low runoff potential<br />

1 B Soils in this group have moderately low runoff potential<br />

2 C Soils in this group have moderately high runoff potential<br />

3 D Soils in this group have high runoff potential<br />

Drainage Density<br />

Table 4-5. Dominant Hydrologic Soil Group Weighting<br />

Drainage density is the total length of all the streams <strong>and</strong> rivers in a drainage basin divided by<br />

the total area of the drainage basin. It is a measure of how well or how poorly a watershed is<br />

drained by stream channels. Drainage density can also affect the shape of a river's hydrograph<br />

during a rain storm. Rivers that have a high drainage density will often have a more 'flashy'<br />

hydrograph with a steep falling limb. High densities can also indicate a greater flood risk.<br />

The watersheds, for this assessment, were defined by the National Frameworks Data,<br />

Hydrology <strong>and</strong> Drainage Areas. These watersheds were used in conjunction with the NHN<br />

dataset to define stream density within a watershed.<br />

This assessment identified drainage densities ranging from about 0.2 to 0.3. A review of<br />

literature focused on assessment of watershed response <strong>and</strong> drainage density provided no<br />

indication of what is considered a “high” drainage density vs. a “low” drainage density. As such,<br />

for the purposes of this prioritization effort the average computed drainage density of 0.26 was<br />

used as the dividing line between upper <strong>and</strong> lower categories. Drainage densities equal to or<br />

less than 0.26 were assigned a priority factor of “0” <strong>and</strong> those above the average were assigned<br />

“1”.<br />

TA1112733 page 102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!