18.06.2015 Views

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

Flood Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Project - Atlantic Climate ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Reduce the risk to public safety during flood events<br />

Reduce incidents of flooding,<br />

Reduce susceptibility to flood damage,<br />

Mitigate the impacts of flooding, <strong>and</strong><br />

Preserve the natural resources of flood plains.<br />

6.2.1 Structural <strong>and</strong> Non-Structural Strategies<br />

Strategies can be Structural (e.g., dams, levees, shore stabilization), or Non-Structural (e.g.,<br />

building codes, regulations <strong>and</strong> flood forecasting warnings). It should be noted that although<br />

flood insurance is not currently available in Canada, it is listed here as a Non-Structural<br />

strategy. Structural strategies can effectively address site or location specific threats, such as<br />

reducing the flood frequency along a river corridor or limiting erosion along a coastline.<br />

Structural strategies utilize engineering approaches to make defined improvements to address a<br />

defined need. However, Structural strategies are generally higher cost flood mitigation<br />

strategies than Non-Structural mechanisms.<br />

Given the scope of this evaluation <strong>and</strong> available data, this report does not specify locations for<br />

structural mitigation measures in the Sub-regions. Instead, this report provides general<br />

guidance that those communities for which structural mitigation measures may be applicable.<br />

Communities should consider identifying locations, through more detailed evaluations, where<br />

construction of structural practices may be appropriate, as part of a more comprehensive flood<br />

mitigation strategy.<br />

Table 6-4 also includes a larger set of Non-Structural strategies. Although there may be<br />

structural components to several of these strategies, Non-Structural strategies are generally<br />

more programmatic in nature, often requiring contributions by regional <strong>and</strong> local government<br />

entities. For instance, building code st<strong>and</strong>ards define structural components required for<br />

development, yet because the components are the result of policy decisions that primarily affect<br />

the development process <strong>and</strong> a site‟s usability, building codes are considered a Non-Structural<br />

strategy.<br />

Local <strong>and</strong> Provincial officials should first consider the benefits of Non-Structural strategies,<br />

before Structural ones, as their costs are typically significantly lower. This is especially the case<br />

where population densities <strong>and</strong> infrastructure investments are relatively low <strong>and</strong> the benefits of<br />

large engineered structures, in terms of flood loss mitigation, are also low.<br />

TA1112733 page 142

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!