wretched-of-the-earth-frantz-fanon

228 THE WRETCHED OF THE EARTHa certain configuration of the nervous system into his patternof behavior. It is a neurologically comprehensible reaction,written into the nature of things, of the thing which is biologicallyorganized. The idleness of the frontal lobes explainsdolence, his crimes, his thefts, his rapcs, and his lies. And theconclusion was given to me by a sous-prefet now prefei: "Theseinstinctive beings," he told me, "who blindly obey the laws oftheir nature must be strictly and pitilessly regimented. Nature mustbe tamed, not talked into reason." Discipline, tame, subdue, andnow pacify are the common terms used by the colonialists in theterritories occupied.reason why we have dealt at length with the theories bycolonialist scholars is not so much to demonstrate their paucityand absurdity as to address an extremely important theoreticaland practical question. Algerian criminality, in fact, was givenrelatively little attention among the questions which the revoluwasconfronted with and the issues which were raised durdiscussionson political enlightenment and demystification.But the few debates on the subject were so constructive that theyenabled us to examine further and better identify the notion ofindividual and social freedom. When the question of Algeriancriminality is broached with leaders and militants in the heat ofrevolution, when the average number of crimes, misdemeanorsand thefts in the period prior to the revolution are brought tolight, when it is explained that the physiognomy of a crime andthe occurrence of misdemeanors are based on the relationshipsbetween men and women, between man and State, andeveryone gets the message; when we see the notion of the Algerianor North Mrican as born criminal dislodged before our verya notion which was also planted in the Algerian's consciousnessbecause after all "we are a bad, quick-tempered, aggressivepeople ... and that's the way we arc ... " then we can saythe revolution is making progress.COLONIAL WAR AND MENTAL DISORDERS 229major theoretical problem is that the insult to man whichis in ourselves must be identified, demystified and hunted downat all times and in all places. We must not expect the nation toproduce new men. We must not expect men to change imperasthe revolution constantly innovates. It is true bothprocesses are important, but it is the consciousness that needshelp. If the revolution in practice is meant to be totally liberatingand exceptionally productive, everything must be accountedfor. The revolutionary feels a particularly strong need to totalizeevents, to handle everything, to settle everything, to assume responsibilityfor everything. The consciousness then does not balkat thinking back or marking time, if need be. This is the reasonwhy as a combat unit progresses in the field the end of an ambushdoes not mean cause for respite but the very moment forconsciousness to go one step further since everything mustwork in unison.Yes, the Algerian spontaneously acknowledged the magistratesand police officers were right. 44 This narcissistic aspect of Algeriancriminality as a manifestation of genuine virility had to betackled again and reconsidered in the light of colonial history.By showing, for example, how the criminality of the Algeriansin France fundamentally differed from the criminality of theAlgerians directly subjected to colonial exploitation.A second aspect caught our attention: in Algeria, criminalityamong Algerians occurred practically in a closed circle. TheAlgerians robbed each other, tore each other to pieces, andkilled each other. In Algeria, the Algerian seldom attacked the44 It is evident, moreover, that this identification with the image inventedby the European was highly ambivalent. The European in fact seemed to bean equally ambivalent tribute to the violent, excitable, brutal, jealous,and arrogant Algerian who stakes his life on a detail or a word, etc, Letus mention in passing that in their confrontations with the French from metropolitanFrance, the Europeans in Algeria increasingly tend to identifY withthis image of the Algerian in their opposition to the French,. ","WE ;'.,