KAIS 2007 1 - Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$D:\My Documents\HBC\HCBC Implem - Kenya National AIDS & STI ...$

Documentation. Results counsellors recorded information about respondents who receivedtheir test results and any referrals onto the results form. This information included the sex ofthe person collecting the result, specific test results returned, the date results were returned,and whether the person came as an individual or was accompanied by a spouse or partner.All forms were submitted to NASCOP at the end of the four to six week period that the testresults were available.Monitoring and supervision. Supervision teams monitored procedures for returning testresults to participants and supported results counsellors in the field. Supervision teamsvisited the field three times during the survey and verified adherence to the protocol forreturning test results, ensured supplies were sufficient, and addressed any acute issuesreported by results counsellors. After each supervisory visit, all supervisors submitted astatus report on the progress of the exercise. Supervisors also met to discuss outcomes of thesupervision visits and address unresolved issues. Feedback was provided to resultscounsellors as necessary.Data management and analysis A Microsoft Access database was created to captureinformation on the activity for returning test results to participants. The database was prepopulatedwith cluster numbers, participant identification numbers, laboratory test results,and reasons for any missing test results. A team of six data managers at NASCOP wastrained on data editing and entry. Upon receiving completed results forms, the team loggedin the cluster numbers to keep track of counsellors who had filed their results forms. Theresults forms were photocopied to provide a backup copy in case of loss and were thenmanually edited and double entered into two separate datasets.The two datasets were compared for consistency and discrepancies were resolved byreferring to the results forms and making changes to the databases accordingly. Once the twodatasets were equivalent, the team ran a series of consistency and range checks to ensure thedata were accurate. Descriptive analyses were performed on the final, cleaned dataset.Fndings from these analyses are reported in Chapter 15 of this report.A.6 WEIGHTING, NON-RESPONSE ADJUSTMENT AND STATISTICALANALYSISSampling weightsSampling weights were incorporated into all statistical analyses. The purpose of weightingwas to correct for unequal probability of selection and to adjust for non‐response to produceresults that were representative of the larger population from which the sample was drawn.We used standard weighting procedures similar to methods used in the 2003 KDHS toincrease comparability of results between surveys.KAIS 2007 298
Design weightsThe 2007 KAIS sample was not self‐weighted and thus a weighting adjustment was requiredto provide estimates representative of the target population. The design weightsincorporated the probabilities of selection of the 1800 clusters into the NASSEP IV sampleframe and the probabilities of selection of the 402 clusters into the KAIS sample from theNASSEP IV clusters. The probabilities of selection of clusters into NASSEP IV were takenfrom the documentation of the NASSEP IV master sample, which was available throughKNBS.Post-stratification adjustmentThe allocation of clusters among the urban and rural areas in each province was based onthe distribution of households across the districts. The allocation resulted in 34 districts withno clusters in their urban strata. Consequently, an adjustment to the weights was made toincrease the representation of urban areas within the affected provinces.Table A6.a shows the ratios of the weighted number of households according to NASSEP IVto the weighted numbers using the base KAIS weights. There was reasonably closeagreement between the two samples by province for Nairobi and for rural areas, but anunder‐representation for other urban areas except Central Province. Thus, we multipliedthe original weights (for the urban areas outside of Nairobi) by the ratios shown in TableA6.a.Table A6.a Ratio of NASSEP IV to original KAIS using sampling fractions at thedistrict level, KAIS 2007.Province Rural Urban TotalNairobi na 1.033 1.033Central 1.037 0.807 1.002Coast 1.084 1.019 1.053Eastern 1.086 1.397 1.104North Eastern 0.950 1.169 0.975Nyanza 1.055 1.183 1.066Rift Valley 1.013 1.762 1.105Western 1.064 1.766 1.113Total 1.047 1.149 1.070Non-response adjustmentBase weights were adjusted for cluster non‐response, household non‐response, andindividual non‐response (both for the interview and the blood draw). Ultimately, eachcluster had three cluster‐specific weights: household, individual interview, and blood draw.All household members captured in the household questionnaire were assigned the samehousehold weight. All individuals within a cluster who participated in the individualinterview or blood draw were assigned the same cluster‐specific weights for individualinterview or blood draw.KAIS 2007 299
Page 1 and 2:
KAIS 2007 1
Page 4 and 5:
P.O. Box: 9361 Code: 00202 Nairobi,
Page 6:
KEMRIKNASPKNBSKshLLITNMCHmlμLMOMSM
Page 10 and 11:
KEY FINDINGS: HIV PREVENTION• Amo
Page 12 and 13:
Among HIV‐uninfected women, 71.2%
Page 14 and 15:
Men 5.4 26.3 1.9Total 7.1 35.1 1.8O
Page 17 and 18:
Kenya is also committed to the “T
Page 19 and 20:
Table 1.4 Distribution of sampled c
Page 22 and 23:
1.7 SURVEY IMPLEMENTATIONTrainingIn
Page 24 and 25:
Data processing included a number o
Page 26 and 27:
Characteristic 2003 KDHS 2007 KAISQ
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 1.11 Sampled clusters and el
Page 30 and 31:
Table 1.11c Survey response rates b
Page 32 and 33:
Population estimates reported in th
Page 34 and 35:
2.4 HIV PREVALENCE AMONG YOUTHFigur
Page 36 and 37:
Figure 2.6b HIV prevalence among ru
Page 38 and 39:
2.7 HIV PREVALENCE BY PROVINCEFigur
Page 40 and 41:
Figure 2.7c Estimated number of HIV
Page 42 and 43:
2.9 HIV PREVALENCE BY EDUCATION LEV
Page 44 and 45:
Figure 2.10b HIV prevalence among r
Page 46 and 47:
2.11 HIV PREVALENCE BY TIME AWAY FR
Page 48 and 49:
2.13 MALE CIRCUMCISION AND ASSOCIAT
Page 50 and 51:
Figure 2.13c HIV prevalence among c
Page 52 and 53:
Comparison of HIV Prevalence in the
Page 54 and 55:
3.3 SEXFigure 3.3a HIV prevalence a
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3.4b. HIV prevalence among m
Page 58 and 59:
3.7 PROVINCEFigure 3.7a HIV prevale
Page 60 and 61:
2003 KDHS 1 2007 KAIS 2Marital stat
Page 62 and 63:
3.10 WEALTH INDEXFigure 3.10a HIV p
Page 64 and 65:
DATA IN CONTEXT: APPROACHES TO HIV
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Figure 4.3c Ever been tested for HI
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 4.3e Ever been tested for HI
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 4.3g Women aged 15-49 years
Page 74 and 75:
Figure 4.4a Time since last HIV tes
Page 76 and 77:
Figure 4.5a Reasons for not testing
Page 78 and 79:
Increasing access to HIV testing wi
Page 80 and 81:
4.7. Gaps and unmet needs• Two‐
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 5.3b Self-reported HIV statu
Page 86 and 87:
This section examines participants
Page 88 and 89:
Figure 5.5a Knowledge of HIV status
Page 90 and 91:
Figure 5.5c Percent of partnerships
Page 92 and 93:
uninfected. A couple was considered
Page 94 and 95:
Figure 5.6c Women and men aged 15-6
Page 96 and 97:
Sexual Partners, Sexual DebutCircum
Page 98 and 99:
Figure 6.3b. HIV prevalence among w
Page 100 and 101:
Figure 6.3d. HIV prevalence among w
Page 102 and 103:
Figure 6.3f. Men aged 15-64 years r
Page 104 and 105:
In this section, “consistent cond
Page 106 and 107:
Figure 6.4c. Marital or cohabiting
Page 108 and 109:
Figure 6.5b. Young women and men ag
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 6.5d. Young women and men ag
Page 112 and 113:
Figure 6.6a. Male circumcision amon
Page 114 and 115:
Figure 6.6d. HIV prevalence among m
Page 116 and 117:
Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs ch
Page 118 and 119:
Figure 7.3b. Most common source of
Page 120 and 121:
Figure 7.3c Women and men aged 15-6
Page 122 and 123:
Figure 7.3e Overall scores for 12 q
Page 124 and 125:
Figure 7.3g Women and men aged 15-6
Page 126 and 127:
Figure 7.3i Correct responses to se
Page 128 and 129:
• If a female teacher has the AID
Page 130 and 131:
7.5. Perceived risk of HIV infectio
Page 132 and 133:
Figure 7.5c Reasons given for havin
Page 134 and 135:
7.6. Attitudes toward women’s rol
Page 136 and 137:
who had never been tested for HIV o
Page 138 and 139:
8.2 INTRODUCTIONIn the absence of i
Page 140 and 141:
8.3 ANTENATAL CLINIC ATTENDANCE, 20
Page 142 and 143:
8.4 KNOWLEDGE OF MOTHER-TO-CHILD TR
Page 144 and 145:
The analysis in this section consid
Page 146 and 147:
Figure 8.5b Women aged 15-49 years
Page 148:
• Incorrect communication or unde
Page 151 and 152:
8.8 CURRENTLY PREGNANT WOMEN: HIV T
Page 153 and 154:
Among currently pregnant women, 7.1
Page 155 and 156:
Among pregnant, HIV‐uninfected wo
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 8.11b Desire for a child in
Page 159 and 160:
8.12 CONTRACEPTIVE USEThe next figu
Page 161 and 162:
Figure 8.12c Contraceptive use* amo
Page 163 and 164:
Blood and Injection Safety chapter
Page 165 and 166:
D ATA IN C ONTEXT: N ATIONAL B LOOD
Page 167 and 168:
Figure 9.3a Source of blood donatio
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 9.3b Source of blood donatio
Page 171 and 172:
Figure 9.3d Source of blood donatio
Page 173 and 174:
9.4 Blood transfusionsAlthough the
Page 175 and 176:
10080Injec tionsPillsNo preferenceW
Page 177 and 178:
HIV prevalence among adults who rep
Page 179 and 180:
9.6 Gaps and unmet needs• HIV pre
Page 181 and 182:
The Ministry of Medical Services re
Page 183 and 184:
10.3 COTRIMOXAZOLE PROPHYLAXIS FOR
Page 185 and 186:
Coverage also varied significantly
Page 187 and 188:
10.4 ARV ELIGIBILITY, COVERAGE AND
Page 189 and 190:
ARV coverage was estimated by takin
Page 191 and 192:
Figure 10.4b ARV coverage among HIV
Page 193 and 194:
DATA IN CONTEXTEstimates of HIV-inf
Page 195 and 196:
10.5 GAPS AND UNMET NEEDS• The es
Page 197 and 198:
debilitating illness leading to hos
Page 199 and 200:
Among HIV‐infected adults (83.6%
Page 201 and 202:
Figure 11.3d HIV-infected adults ag
Page 203 and 204:
Figure 11.4b HIV-infected adults ag
Page 205 and 206:
Figure 11.4d HIV-infected adults ag
Page 207 and 208:
DATA IN CONTEXTHIV Basic Care Packa
Page 209 and 210:
Figure 11.5b HIV-infected adults ag
Page 211 and 212:
Figure 11.6b Percent of HIV-infecte
Page 213 and 214:
11.8 GAPS AND UNMET NEEDS• Counse
Page 215 and 216:
12.3 HSV-2 prevalenceHSV‐2 preval
Page 217 and 218:
807071.0WomenMen64.3HSV-2 Prevalenc
Page 219 and 220:
Figure 12.3d HSV-2 prevalence among
Page 221 and 222:
Figure 12.4b HSV-2 prevalence among
Page 223 and 224:
Figure 12.5a HIV prevalence by HSV-
Page 225 and 226:
Figure 12.6b Condom use during last
Page 227 and 228:
12.7 Gaps and unmet needs• Increa
Page 229 and 230:
also at substantially elevated risk
Page 231 and 232:
Figure 13.3b Prevalence of syphilis
Page 233 and 234:
Figure 13.3d Prevalence of syphilis
Page 235 and 236:
Figure 13.3f Prevalence of syphilis
Page 237 and 238:
Figure 13.4b Prevalence of syphilis
Page 239 and 240:
13.6 GAPS AND UNMET NEEDS• Patien
Page 241 and 242:
Household Characteristics andImpact
Page 243 and 244:
Figure 14.3a Sex of head of househo
Page 245 and 246:
Figure 14.3d Household population,
Page 247 and 248: 14.5 PREVALENCE OF HIV-AFFECTED HOU
Page 249 and 250: Figure 14.5c HIV-affected household
Page 251 and 252: social and economic conditions of h
Page 253 and 254: households used chemical disinfecta
Page 255 and 256: 14.7 HOUSEHOLD OWNERSHIP OF MOSQUIT
Page 257 and 258: Figure 14.7b HIV-affected and HIV-u
Page 259 and 260: Table 14.7b Source of bednets among
Page 261 and 262: Overall, 52.3% percent of children
Page 263 and 264: 14.9 CARE AND SUPPORT FOR ORPHANS A
Page 265 and 266: For consistency with other populati
Page 267: Returning Test Results15.1 KEY FIND
Page 270 and 271: Figure 15.3b. Participants aged 15-
Page 272 and 273: Figure 15.3d. Participants aged 15-
Page 274 and 275: Figure 15.3f. Participants aged 15-
Page 276 and 277: 15.4 RETURNING TO RECEIVE TEST RESU
Page 278 and 279: Figure 15.5 Women aged 15-64 years
Page 280 and 281: Methods of the 2007 KAISThis Append
Page 282 and 283: ClustersHouseholdsProvince Rural Ur
Page 284 and 285: and treatment services and other he
Page 286 and 287: The KEMRI Ethical Review Committee
Page 288 and 289: Red top (5 ml)Whole blood collected
Page 290 and 291: algorithm using two HIV EIAs (Viron
Page 292 and 293: Figure A5.a. Structure and flow of
Page 294 and 295: Recruitment and training of results
Page 296 and 297: observe confidentiality of particip
Page 300 and 301: Normalisation of weightsNormalised
Page 302 and 303: This report presents the results of
show all

KAIS 2007 1 - Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?