10.07.2015 Views

KAIS 2007 1 - Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme ...

KAIS 2007 1 - Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme ...

KAIS 2007 1 - Kenya National AIDS & STI Control Programme ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Comparison of HIV Prevalence in the chapter 32003 KDHS and <strong>2007</strong> <strong>KAIS</strong>3.1 KEY FINDINGS• The national HIV prevalence estimate in <strong>2007</strong> was 7.4% among adults aged 15‐49years, compared with 6.7% in 2003. This difference was not statistically significant.• HIV prevalence significantly increased among men living in rural populationsbetween 2003 and <strong>2007</strong>.• HIV prevalence tended to increase in five of the eight provinces; these increases weremarginally significant or significant.• Significant changes in HIV prevalence by wealth index and education level wereobserved between 2003 and <strong>2007</strong>. Individuals of lower socioeconomic status hadsignificantly higher prevalence in <strong>2007</strong> than in 2003.3.2 INTRODUCTIONPrevious demographic and health surveys were conducted in <strong>Kenya</strong> in 1989, 1993, 1998 and 2003. The2003 KDHS was the first to include HIV testing in a nationally representative sample of women aged15‐49 years and men aged 15‐54 years. The <strong>2007</strong> <strong>KAIS</strong> included HIV testing for women and men aged15‐64 years. Thus, to understand changes in HIV prevalence between 2003 and <strong>2007</strong>, we comparedHIV prevalence between women and men in the age groups covered in both surveys. Most of thecomparisons presented in this chapter are among women and men aged 15‐49 years.Appendix B.3 provides sample sizes and 95% confidence intervals for estimates presented in thischapter. The z‐test statistic was used to compare the two weighted estimates from the 2003 KDHSand the <strong>2007</strong> <strong>KAIS</strong> and to determine if differences were statistically significant. Methods used forcalculating the z‐test statistic are described in Appendix A. Throughout the chapter, the termsignificant indicates a p‐value less than 0.05; marginally significant indicates a p‐value between0.05 and 0.10, inclusive; and not significant indicates a p‐value greater than 0.10.<strong>KAIS</strong> <strong>2007</strong> 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!