Private Academies of Chinese Learning in Meiji Japan: The Decline ...

LIFE AT THE JUKU 173kyōikuka (Roman, 1973), which does not however mention herstudy at Nishō gakusha.115 Yamamura, Bakumatsu jusha no shōgai, 148–153.116 Karazawa, Gakusei no rekishi, 47.117 Kōda Rohan in Meishi no gakusei jidai, 200–202.118 Inukai Kōhei, Inukai Bokudō to San’yo juku (Kurashiki: Kurashikirekishikan, 1959), 5–8.119 The best description in English of the controversy is in Paul Varley,Imperial Restoration in Medieval Japan (New York: ColumbiaUniversity Press, 1971), 156–183.120 Tsunetō Toshisuke, Bakumatsu no shijuku Zōshun’en: kyōiku nogenryū notazunete (Fukuoka: Ashi shobō, 1992), 33–35.121 Tokyo-to kyōikushi (ed. and publ. Tōkyō toritsu kyōikujo, 1994), 55.122 Takanari Tadakaze, “Kangaku o shū to shite no shijuku”,Fukushima Kashizō, ed. Kinsei Nihon no jugaku (Iwanami shoten,1939), 24.123 Kyōiku enkakushi zairyō no honkoku, p.33.124 Chihōshi kenkyūkai, ed.and publ., Bungo no shijuku/terakoya, Ōita,1976.125 Rubinger, Private Academies, 59; 69–71.126 Kuroki Moriyuki, ed., Yasui Sokken shokanshū (Miyazaki-kenMiyazaki-gun Kiyotake-chō: Yasui Sokken kenshōkai, 1987), 244–246.127 Tokyo kyōikushi shiryō taikei, 1:410; 1:513.128 Application in Tōkyō kyōikushi shiryō taikei, 1:394–395; see alsoTōkyō-fukaigaku meisaisho, 2:36–37.129 Tōkyō kyōikushi shiryō taikei, 1:377; 7:667–668.130 “Seitatsu shoin no tenmatsu”, 135–145.131 Kanbe, Nihon ni okeru chūgakkō, 822–834.132 Chōzenkan yowa, 169; 136.133 Ōsaka-fu kyōiku hyakunenshi, (4 vols., publ. and ed. Ōsakafu kyōikuiinkai, 1972), 3:1014–1016.134 Katayama Sen jiden, 89–90.135 Kokubun Izō, quoted in Nishō gakusha hyakunenshi, 237.136 “Kajuku shutsugan no dan’an”, Seikei shoin 9 (25 November 1982):2–3.137 Shibun 20 (1938):54.138 Kanbe Yasumitsu, “Meiji shoki shijuku no shinbun kōkoku”,Shigakukenkyū kiyō dai 7 shū (1964): 135–148.