02.12.2012 Views

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TA 4721-PRC: Preparing the Shaanxi-Qinling Mountains Integrated Ecosystem Management Project<br />

<strong>Final</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Appendix 13<br />

Team used the “analogy” method by assessing attendance and pricing at other tourism facilities, such<br />

as the Xishuangbanna Topical Botanical Garden which is 527 km from Kunming, the Shenyang<br />

Botanical Garden noted earlier which is 40 km away from the Shenyang City Center, and the Xi’an<br />

Qinling Wildlife Park which is also on the North Slope of the Qinling and is 40 km away from the city<br />

center. The attendance and pricing figures from these tourism facilities were used to justify first year<br />

attendance of 600,000 and an entry fee of CNY70 for the Botanical Garden.<br />

32. The PPTA Team developed a second attendance/pricing scenario that had lower attendance<br />

and prices in the early years, which would both grow significantly through time as the BG and the<br />

Qinling became better known in the tourism market, the Botanical garden matured and therefore<br />

became more interesting to the general tourist as well as biodiversity enthusiasts, and per capita<br />

incomes, consumer purchasing power and the percentage of expenditures allocated to tourism and<br />

recreation all continue to increase in Xi’an, Shaanxi, and other PRC market segments.<br />

33. The following table compares the pricing strategies of the Design Team and PPTA Team<br />

scenarios. Revenues from each source are varied under the PPTA Team pricing/revenue strategy by<br />

increasing through time the percentage of visitors who use each service. Alternatively, the same<br />

results could be generated by holding the percentages constant and decreasing the price paid for<br />

each service. The implications for revenue would be the same. For example, for the same<br />

attendance and percentage of visitors (fixed at 85%), the price per visitor to the Ancient Biodiversity<br />

Building would need to decrease from CNY30 to CNY25 in order generate the same revenue for 2011<br />

from this source.<br />

34. However, under the PPTA team’s preferred attendance/revenue and pricing scenario,<br />

attendance at start-up is also lower – since the Botanical gardens are immature and the BG facility is<br />

not yet fully established. Benefit estimation was based on a visitor profile starting from 350,000 in<br />

2011 and increasing at an average growth rate of 5.3 % of the life of the analysis. Entry fees of CNY<br />

50 per visitor were used. The Feasibility study used a start up figure of 600,000 visitor at an entry fee<br />

of CNY75 per visitor.<br />

Table 3: QBG Visitor Projection Assumptions<br />

Assumptions:<br />

Entry<br />

Fee(CNY)<br />

1 BG Attendance at the first year 350000 50<br />

Growth Rate(Average) 5.29%<br />

2 Percentage of Total will visit Paleontology 85% 30<br />

3 Percentage of Total will visit Temple 30% 30<br />

4 Percentage of Total will take electric vehicle 50% 30<br />

5 Percentage of Total will take cableway 30% 60<br />

6 Percentage of Total will have fast food 30% 20<br />

7 Every 50 tourists will park once 50 20<br />

35. The estimated visitors per attraction use din both the financial and economic analysis are<br />

presented table 4.<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!