02.12.2012 Views

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

Final Report - Asian Development Bank

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

continuing communication among stakeholders to improve management of the system as a whole and<br />

there is a need for a more formal venue for interaction of individuals, groups, and agencies.<br />

40. For example, professional managers and scientists at nature reserves do not have adequate<br />

interaction with colleagues at other Qinling nature reserves. Similarly, researchers often interact with a<br />

single nature reserve to carry out a given project, but seldom extend their results to other nature reserves.<br />

Tourism, land management, and water resource agencies are stakeholders in Qinling resource<br />

management but there is no formal venue for exchange and discussion of their contributions. Village,<br />

township, and county leaders have limited opportunities to interact with resource managers in the Qinling<br />

except where Nature Reserve Managers have received training and project level support to do so. For a<br />

few NR’s such as Taibaishan, Zhouzhi and Foping significant and ongoing benefits to both eh NR and<br />

local communities is reported however the lack of sustained operational funding after Project completion<br />

is eroding many of the management gains.<br />

(b) From Reforestation to Habitat Restoration two species of exotic larch were planted in monocultures<br />

in the Qinling beginning in the 1950s and accelerating in the 1980s. In addition to introducing<br />

exotic species that are ecologically inappropriate to the Qinling, these plantations have also formed dense<br />

stands of trees with little or no under-storey vegetation. WWF has begun a program to plant indigenous<br />

bamboo species beneath the larch canopies for restoration of foraging habitat of the Giant Panda. This<br />

program is hampered by the institutional restriction against felling of trees on the Qinling (NFPP) and in<br />

protected areas (State Council regulation on activities permitted in nature reserves). These institutional<br />

barriers prohibit removal of unwanted, inappropriate trees that were planted during an era when<br />

introduction of exotics was seen as a fast means of establishing forest cover and wood supply and when<br />

exotic species were not viewed as an ecological threat. Retaining such trees precludes efficient planting<br />

of indigenous bamboos that are preferred by the Qinling flagship species, giant Panda, and would<br />

contribute directly to continued recovery of Panda populations in the Qinling Mountains.<br />

(c) Adaptive management and Learning. Recent programs for land conversion e.g., Natural Forest<br />

Protection Program (NFPP) and Steep Land Conversion Program (SLCP), have not received adequate<br />

monitoring to determine their ecological or socio-economic effectiveness. Natural forests have not been<br />

studied after the logging ban of NFPP in 1998 to assess recovery rates or ecological aspects of forest and<br />

vegetation recovery. Use of timber by villages in and around protected areas has not been assessed.<br />

Comparative analyses of remote sensing data have not been undertaken to assess NFPP impacts on total<br />

forest cover.<br />

41. SLCP was applied to 6,000-8,000 km 2 of the Qinling and the program continues through 2007.<br />

No monitoring has been undertaken to quantify effectiveness in terms of vegetation cover, tree survival,<br />

or outcomes in terms of farm economics.<br />

(d) Species Recovery. The captive populations of Crested Ibis have grown to unmanageable levels at the<br />

Yang County (over 200 birds) and Zhouzhi County (over 220 birds) breeding centers. Maintenance of<br />

such large numbers of captive birds of any species is ill advised, particularly in the era of SARS and avian<br />

influenza. China’s increasing network of wetland nature reserves provides a wealth of potentially suitable<br />

release sites for some of the captive birds. PRC is planning a release program as is IUCN-SSC through<br />

its Stork, Ibis and Spoonbill Specialist Group. Japan is also developing a release program at Sado Island<br />

based on recent successes in natural reproduction of captive birds (young fledged from nests built and<br />

tended by captive adult birds). Nature reserves in Russia and the Koreas have also expressed interest to<br />

participate in a release program.<br />

42. Similar to the giant Panda the Crested Ibis program has successfully bred and reared captive<br />

birds to te point that some breeding centers are financially unable to grow further due to the cost of forage<br />

or food. To date limited release of birds has been undertaken and even this is poorly monitored. There has

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!