Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea
Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea
Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
–“clean, easy to use drug <strong>and</strong> convenient” (effect) with “those who take <strong>ecstasy</strong>don’t dr<strong>in</strong>k at the same time” <strong>and</strong> with “the problem with <strong>ecstasy</strong> is that you don’tknow what you are tak<strong>in</strong>g” (problematic).–“relax<strong>in</strong>g” (effect) with “dangerous drug because it creates addiction” <strong>and</strong> with“leads to death” (problematic).–“sharpens ideas” (effect) with “depressive <strong>in</strong> the long term” (problematic).–“Reasonable price” (effect before) with “leads to death” <strong>and</strong> “dangerous drugbecause it creates addiction” (problematic).We see that none <strong>of</strong> the 4 items which have served to establish bridges between bothcha<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>representation</strong> are those which we could consider essential <strong>in</strong> the def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong>one or other block. For example, the fact that the item “<strong>ecstasy</strong> has a reasonable price”has associations with items which are normally <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> the implied problematic,does not appear to change th<strong>in</strong>gs much. Also “clean, easy to use drug <strong>and</strong> convenient”is a relatively neutral item <strong>and</strong> it should not surprise us that it is associated with items<strong>in</strong> the “problematic” block such as “those who take <strong>ecstasy</strong> don’t dr<strong>in</strong>k alcohol at thesame time” or “the problem is that you don’t know what you’re tak<strong>in</strong>g”.That “sharpens the ideas” which belongs to the “effects” block shows associationwith “depressive <strong>in</strong> the long term” may simply signify -bear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d that each itemis chosen <strong>in</strong> the contrary sense <strong>of</strong> belong<strong>in</strong>g to two different blocks- that it is <strong>in</strong>agreement, that it sharpens ideas <strong>and</strong> that it rejects the idea that it produces depressions.“relaxes” is one <strong>of</strong> the less typical effects. In fact, it is one <strong>of</strong> the effects least chosen -we rem<strong>in</strong>d you that it is one <strong>of</strong> the questions <strong>in</strong> that part <strong>of</strong> the questionnaire deal<strong>in</strong>gwith the characteristics <strong>of</strong> <strong>ecstasy</strong> consumption- with the exception <strong>of</strong> the Dutch samplewhere, once aga<strong>in</strong>, we see that it behaves differently. Therefore, its association with twothemes <strong>in</strong> the problematic block does not distort.ITEMS WHICH CHANGE THE BLOCKAmong the components which change its usual position are “with <strong>ecstasy</strong> you losecontrol” <strong>and</strong> “people who take <strong>ecstasy</strong> are people with problems” which go from theproblematic sector to the effects group. “loss <strong>of</strong> control” could be perfectly understoodas an effect -desirable even, for sensation seekers- fitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> perfectly with the otheritems <strong>in</strong> the group. Simply, it is an item which stops be<strong>in</strong>g thought <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong>problematic <strong>and</strong> goes on to become, more or less, an effect. We can f<strong>in</strong>d lessexplanation for the change <strong>in</strong> position <strong>of</strong> the second item “people who take <strong>ecstasy</strong> arepeople with problems”.“Reasonable price” gives up its associations with the items that form the “effects”group attributable to <strong>ecstasy</strong> <strong>and</strong> becomes part <strong>of</strong> the problematic block (<strong>of</strong> the threeassociation, there are two with items from the problematic po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view). We believethat it is not a very emblematic component <strong>and</strong> its partial association with theproblematic does not compromise the group.115