13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After analys<strong>in</strong>g the results by groups <strong>and</strong> by scales, discover<strong>in</strong>g by these means thesignificant differences between the scores <strong>of</strong> the different groups, we can say that thescales which present a greater sensitivity from the po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the number <strong>of</strong>significant differences are the Boredom Susceptibility Subscale <strong>and</strong> the Dis<strong>in</strong>hibitionSubscale, <strong>in</strong> that order. Whereas those that present a lesser sensitivity are the Thrills <strong>and</strong>Adventure Seek<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> the Experience Seek<strong>in</strong>g Subscales, also <strong>in</strong> that order.6.2.4. SSS <strong>in</strong> the global sample by sex variable.Traditionally, this scale is very sensitive to the differences <strong>in</strong> sex. In our case, as wesee, it also produces these differences. But it will not be possible to analyse very deeplythe importance <strong>of</strong> gender as we did not separate the two sexes by consumption groups.SSS BY SEX VARIABLETAS ES DIS BS GLOBALMen 5,8914 6,0146 5,8649 4,4832 22,2073(2,234) (1,804) (1,964) (1,794) (5,119)Women 5,5133 6,1261 5,2789 3,8025 20,8109(2,432) (1,900) (2,066) (1,881) (5,556)t-value 2,95 -1,10 5,28 6,80 4,332-Tail 0,05

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!