13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INDEXPág.1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131.1. Designer drugs, synthetic drugs <strong>and</strong> <strong>ecstasy</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131.2. Situation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Europe</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181.3. Objectives <strong>of</strong> the research . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252. METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272.1. Situation <strong>and</strong> need <strong>of</strong> the qualitative methodologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272.2. Research design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302.3. Techniques <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>struments used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 302.3.1. Semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviews . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312.3.2. Documentary <strong>and</strong> bibliographical analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312.3.3. Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313. SAMPLE DESIGN AND FIELD WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353.1. Sample design. General aspects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353.2. Disco sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363.3. University sample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373.4. Field work reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373.4.1. Coimbra (Portugal) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373.4.2. Modena (Italy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383.4.3. Nice (France) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393.4.4. Palma de Mallorca (Spa<strong>in</strong>) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 403.4.5. Utrecht (Netherl<strong>and</strong>s) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414. SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435. CHARACTERISTICS OF ECSTASY USE. DIFFERENCES5. BETWEEN CONSUMERS AND NON CONSUMERS . . . . . . 536. SENSATION SEEKING SCALE (SSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 756.1. Bibliographical analysis. Theoretical fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 756.2. Results sensation seek<strong>in</strong>g . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 786.2.1. SSS scores for the overall sample by country . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 796.2.2. Score on the SSS Scale by sample type differentiat<strong>in</strong>g consumers ornon-consumers <strong>of</strong> <strong>ecstasy</strong> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!