13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2.3.1. Semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviewsIn the exploratory phase, all the representatives <strong>of</strong> the different cities <strong>in</strong> the projectmade semi-structured <strong>in</strong>terviews follow<strong>in</strong>g the same plan (see annex 1). Each countryhad to make four <strong>in</strong>terviews, two to <strong>ecstasy</strong> users, <strong>and</strong> two to non-<strong>ecstasy</strong> users (be<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>different if they used other drugs). The <strong>in</strong>terviewee had to speak about the topicssettled <strong>in</strong> the project plan, but the <strong>in</strong>terviewer should never transform that <strong>in</strong> anexam<strong>in</strong>ation, because the spontaneity <strong>of</strong> the answers were essential <strong>in</strong> this exploratoryphase.The objective <strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong>terviews was to know the ideas, images, etc. concern<strong>in</strong>g<strong>ecstasy</strong>, as well as to approximate us to ways <strong>of</strong> life, night environments, music, <strong>and</strong>other elements bound to this type <strong>of</strong> drug use.2.3.2. Documentary <strong>and</strong> bibliographical analysisEach country had to make a bibliographical research <strong>and</strong> analyse those documents(scientific as well as journalistic) related to designer drugs, <strong>in</strong> order to see the way thistopic had been treated <strong>in</strong> their country <strong>and</strong> to gather the most popular attitudes,convictions <strong>and</strong> ideas that the authors <strong>of</strong> these documents transmit to the readers (seeannex 2).INVESTIGATION PHASE.2.3.3. QuestionnaireThe closed questionnaire (see annex 3) was the selected method for collect<strong>in</strong>g the<strong>in</strong>formation needed. After shar<strong>in</strong>g the op<strong>in</strong>ions <strong>and</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> view <strong>in</strong> the differentcountries on a meet<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> analys<strong>in</strong>g several questionnaires, we got, through mail <strong>and</strong>telephonic conversations, a common questionnaire that had four different parts:• Part I: Sociodemographic variables (basically to know the characteristics <strong>of</strong> thesample <strong>and</strong> be able to make the selection <strong>of</strong> the control group accord<strong>in</strong>g to age,sex, study level, socioeconomic level,…).• Part II: Variables <strong>of</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> characteristic <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>and</strong> ways <strong>of</strong> life.• Part III: Sensations Seeker <strong>and</strong> Social Deviation scales.The Sensations Seeker Scale was designed by Zuckerman to quantify the “optimumstimulation level” concept (Cárdenas <strong>and</strong> Moreno, 1989), which means that each<strong>in</strong>dividual has his own optimum stimulation level. This scale has several versions, <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong> this study it has been used the last one, the version V, that has the same factors that31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!