13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

consumers sample comprises <strong>in</strong>dividuals who do not take <strong>ecstasy</strong> but may be tak<strong>in</strong>ganother type <strong>of</strong> drug. In fact, analysis <strong>of</strong> the consumption variables (see chapter 5)shows us that non-consumers also make use <strong>of</strong> drugs, notably alcohol <strong>and</strong> cannabis. The<strong>ecstasy</strong> consumers sample, for its part, comprises <strong>in</strong>dividuals who consume other types<strong>of</strong> drug -multiconsumers <strong>in</strong> other words-<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> addition, who consume them withgreater frequency than the non <strong>ecstasy</strong> consumer group.Therefore, the difference between the non-consumers <strong>and</strong> consumers sample is notonly that the former do not use <strong>ecstasy</strong> <strong>and</strong> the latter do but that, <strong>in</strong> general, the<strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> the <strong>ecstasy</strong> non-consumer sample use drugs with a lower frequency thanthose <strong>in</strong> the <strong>ecstasy</strong> consumers sample.Below, we give the results <strong>of</strong> the Sensation Seek<strong>in</strong>g Scale (SSS) <strong>and</strong> the differentsubscales that it comprises <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> the four variables:1. Country.2. Sample type.3. Consumer group.4. Sex.In order to ascerta<strong>in</strong> the significance <strong>of</strong> the differences between the mean scoreresult<strong>in</strong>g from the analysis broken down by country, sample type <strong>and</strong> consumer group,several parametric tests <strong>and</strong> the non-parametric test by Kruskal Wallis were carried out.The table shows the values obta<strong>in</strong>ed for this latter test, <strong>in</strong> that some sub-scales do notgive the implications necessary for the comparison <strong>of</strong> the means with parametric tests<strong>and</strong> this type <strong>of</strong> non-parametric test is the most appropriate.In order to f<strong>in</strong>d the differences <strong>in</strong> mean scores <strong>in</strong> respect <strong>of</strong> sex, an analysis wasapplied <strong>of</strong> mean differences based on the variance.6.2.1. SSS scores for the overall sample by country.In this section, the mean scores <strong>of</strong> each city were calculated <strong>and</strong> compared for theoverall sample (all the people <strong>in</strong>terviewed <strong>in</strong> each city). In order to be able to betterexpla<strong>in</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong> <strong>of</strong> the difference between the various cities, the results have beencompleted with a factorial analysis between the type <strong>of</strong> consumer variable <strong>and</strong> thecountry variable, so that, <strong>in</strong> this way, we can justify some <strong>of</strong> the differences thatappear.We have considered 5 types <strong>of</strong> consumers; non-consumers <strong>of</strong> <strong>ecstasy</strong> (practicallyhalf the sample), occasional or experimental consumers, habitual, compulsives <strong>and</strong> exconsumers.79

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!