13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

seek<strong>in</strong>g scale, the hypotheses for the comparison <strong>of</strong> medians through this tests were notfulfilled <strong>in</strong> every case <strong>and</strong>, therefore, <strong>in</strong> the table appear the results <strong>of</strong> the nonparametrictest <strong>of</strong> Kruskal Wallis applicable to this cases.SDS results accord<strong>in</strong>g to towns.Punctuation SDSCoimbra 1,7148 (1,8163)Modena 1,3369 (1,5722)Nice 1,9967 (1,9636)Palma de Mallorca 1,8558 (1,8113)Utrecht 2,2361 (1,8786)K-W (p) 39,33 (0,0001)The highest punctuation corresponds, therefore, to the sample <strong>of</strong> Utrecht, followedclosely by the sample <strong>of</strong> Nice, <strong>and</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g the lowest punctuation the one thatcorresponds to the Modena sample. In reference to significant differences amongpunctuation <strong>of</strong> the five countries, Utrecht has a mean punctuation significantly higherthan Palma, Coimbra y Modena. Besides, the mean punctuation <strong>of</strong> Modena issignificantly lower than Nice <strong>and</strong> Palma. For that reason, <strong>in</strong> reference to the <strong>social</strong>deviation <strong>of</strong> the global sample, we f<strong>in</strong>d the highest punctuation <strong>in</strong> Utrecht <strong>and</strong> Nice, an<strong>in</strong>termediate punctuation <strong>in</strong> Palma de Mallorca <strong>and</strong> the lowest punctuation’s <strong>in</strong>Coimbra <strong>and</strong> Modena.SDS ACCORDING TO THE KIND OF SAMPLE(UNIVERSITY OR DISCO AND ECSTASY CONSUMER OR NON CONSUMER)The follow<strong>in</strong>g table conta<strong>in</strong>s the results <strong>of</strong> the SDS scale on the basis <strong>of</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong>sample, depend<strong>in</strong>g if they are <strong>in</strong>dividuals from the university sample or the discosample. So, we will cont<strong>in</strong>ue compar<strong>in</strong>g all the <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>of</strong> the five cities sampleswho compose the disco sample with the <strong>in</strong>dividuals who compose the universitysample, subdivided <strong>in</strong> the two possibilities <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g or not <strong>ecstasy</strong> users. The differencesamong medians have been found as <strong>in</strong> the previous item <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the table resultscorrespond to the Kruskal Wallis test.SDS results accord<strong>in</strong>g to university <strong>and</strong> disco sample.Punctuation SDSUniversity non consumer 0,9141 (1,1551)University consumer 2,4295 (1,8248)Disco non consumer 1,5571 (1,6636)Disco consumer 2,7751 (2,0631)K-W (p) 251,78 (0,0001)92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!