13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RELATIONSHIP WITH PARENTS ACCORDING TO DIFFERENTCONSUMER GROUPS REFFERED TO GLOBAL SAMPLE (N=1.627).Very bad Bad Neither good nor bad Good Very goodNon consumer 00,9 2,3 18,5 44,4 33,9Occasional C. 01,9 3,1 32,3 43,6 19,1Regular C. 01,3 8,4 38,1 35,5 16,8Compulsive C. 22,0 8,0 18,0 32,0 20,0Ex consumer 01,2 5,0 25,0 44,2 24,6As we have seen <strong>in</strong> the preced<strong>in</strong>g Table, the relationship <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> thesample with their parents is, <strong>in</strong> general, good <strong>in</strong> all the countries. But <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> thistrend there are significant (p. ,001) differences accord<strong>in</strong>g the type <strong>of</strong> use <strong>in</strong> theirrelationship with their families. These differences are clearly observed if we lookspecially to the categories “bad” or “very bad”.In this way, the control group, the non-<strong>ecstasy</strong> users, is the one that shows the lowestpercentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who have “very bad” (0.9%) or bad (2.3%) relationships withtheir parents <strong>and</strong> the one which shows the highest percentages <strong>in</strong> the “good” (44.4%)<strong>and</strong> “very good” relationships (33.9%) categories.As for <strong>ecstasy</strong> users, the ex-users group is the one that shows the best relationshipswith their parents with 68,8% declar<strong>in</strong>g that they have a good or very good relationship.But the greater the frequency <strong>of</strong> use the more these differences are accentuated, thehabitual users be<strong>in</strong>g those who have a greater percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals with “bad”relationships (8.4%) <strong>and</strong> the compulsive users those who show the bigger percentage <strong>of</strong>“very bad” relationships (22%).RELIGION BELIEVER (% on global sample)COIMBRA MODENA NICE PALMA UTRECHTGlob C NC Glob C NC Glob C NC Glob C NC Glob C NCYes 57,6 42,5 72,8 59,5 54,2 64,3 42,4 36,6 46,7 46,1 37,5 55,2 21,2 17,3 25,1Glob: Global sample C: Consumer NC: Non ConsumerThis variable was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the questionnaire because <strong>in</strong> several epidemiologicalstudies, religion has a correlation with low use <strong>of</strong> drugs. Religion is a sort <strong>of</strong> protectivefactor aga<strong>in</strong>st consumption, as is the case also <strong>in</strong> this study. The most religious sampleare people from Modena (59,5%), followed closely by Coimbra (57,6%) <strong>and</strong> not soclosely by Palma de Mallorca (46%). The less religious <strong>in</strong>dividuals are the French(39,3%) <strong>and</strong> Dutch (21,2%).With regard to the religious differences between consumers <strong>and</strong> non-consumers,they are quite obvious. Consumers are, <strong>in</strong> a significant way, less religion believers thannon-consumers.57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!