13.07.2015 Views

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

Characteristics and social representation of ecstasy in Europe - Irefrea

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In Utrecht, most <strong>of</strong> the young people are <strong>in</strong>dependent from their families <strong>and</strong> livewith a couple/married or alone, above all <strong>in</strong> residences (36%). Emancipation at such anearly age is someth<strong>in</strong>g that answers to cultural <strong>and</strong> economical matters. In this sense,we already know that the sample <strong>of</strong> Utrecht has a higher purchas<strong>in</strong>g power <strong>and</strong> animportant percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals have a scholarship or a job.In comparison with Modena <strong>and</strong> Palma de Mallorca we f<strong>in</strong>d that Utrecht <strong>and</strong> Nicehave a quite low percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who live with their families. It st<strong>and</strong>s out thehigh percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals who live <strong>in</strong> these two towns with a couple/married (19%<strong>in</strong> Nice <strong>and</strong> 20,1 <strong>in</strong> Utrecht) or alone (27,7% <strong>in</strong> Nice <strong>and</strong> 17,6 <strong>in</strong> Utrecht). This data isalso connected with a better economical status.In Coimbra, it st<strong>and</strong>s out the high percentage <strong>of</strong> young people who live with friends. Wesuppose they are students from other areas that share a flat while study<strong>in</strong>g at the university.HOW MUCH DO THEY EARN PER MONTH (In ECU)COIMBRA MODENA NICE PALMA UTRECHTMean 342,80 446,90 830,8 434,9 594,9St<strong>and</strong>ard Deviation 235,00 485,64 700,1 425,4 458,1M-Estimator (Huber) 295,28 284,00 688,3 338,9 514,9There are significant differences (test de Kruskal-Wallis) between the French <strong>and</strong>Dutch sample <strong>and</strong> the other cities, though Utrecht <strong>and</strong> Nice have also differencesbetween them. In order to read the table it is recommended to follow the M-Estimator<strong>of</strong> Huber, s<strong>in</strong>ce the st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation is high <strong>and</strong> the mean can <strong>in</strong>duce to an error.Nice, followed by Utrecht, is the city where young people earn more per week. Theexplanation <strong>of</strong> these differences is found <strong>in</strong> the purchas<strong>in</strong>g power <strong>of</strong> each country.Nevertheless, there are other reasons, as we have seen <strong>in</strong> the analysis <strong>of</strong> other tables<strong>of</strong> this study. The mean <strong>in</strong>terviewee from these two cities is older, <strong>in</strong>dependent fromhis/her family <strong>and</strong> has a job. We must also remember that a higher percentage <strong>of</strong> theUtrecht sample consider themselves to a high/middle-high <strong>social</strong> level -63,5%- though<strong>in</strong> other cities this percentage is around 27%. Besides, <strong>in</strong> those two cities there are moreuniversity students than <strong>in</strong> Coimbra, Modena <strong>and</strong> Palma.MONEY’S ORIGIN (In %)COIMBRA# MODENA++ NICE** PALMA* UTRECHT+Family 60,2 60,8 32,1 46,6 03,4Permanent job 20,7 27,8 41,3 17,6 25,1Temporary job 13,3 08,4 08,6 28,3 45,9Scholarship 01,7 00,8 07,9 02,0 18,7Public assistance 01,2 00,4 05,1 01,0 04,6Others 02,9 01,7 05,1 04,6 02,4# 38 Miss<strong>in</strong>g ++83 Miss<strong>in</strong>g ** 25 Miss<strong>in</strong>g * 30 Miss<strong>in</strong>g +39 Miss<strong>in</strong>g49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!