Brown Field Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONyears. The relationship between a compatibility plan and an airport master plan or ALP, centers on thecurrent and future airport layout and existing and projected airport activity.The responsibility for the Airport’s master plan lies with the airport proprietor, the City of San Diego.The current master plan for the Airport was adopted in May 1980. Updates to the Airport’s master planwere prepared in 1990 and 2000 but were never adopted. In late 2007/early 2008 the City initiated aMaster Plan Update process. Approval of the Master Plan Update, which includes a comprehensiveupdate to the Airport’s ALP, is anticipated in 2010. In the absence of a current master plan, state lawallows an ALUC’s compatibility plan to be based on an ALP with the approval of the Division ofAeronautics. In a letter dated June 19, 2008, the Division of Aeronautics approved the ALUC’s request touse the airport operator’s most recent ALP for the Airport. The approval letter is provided in Appendix I.1.3 FORECASTING METHODOLOGYState law requires that a compatibility plan reflect “the anticipated growth of the airport during at least thenext 20 years” (Pub. Util. Code §21675(a)). In addition, as discussed above, the compatibility plan is tobe based on the airport operator’s adopted airport master plan, where one exists, or an ALP that has beenaccepted by the Division of Aeronautics for airport compatibility planning. ALUC planning assumptionsregarding future aircraft activity at an airport must be consistent with the role of the airport as identifiedin an airport master plan or ALP.Frequently, unless the airport master plan is recent, the forecasts cannot be used directly because they donot cover the requisite 20-year period. This issue is addressed in the Handbook:[M]ost airports presumably will remain in operation for more than 20 years. This factor combinedwith the characteristic uncertainty of forecasting suggests that, for the purpose of airport land usecompatibility planning, using a high estimate of long-range activity levels is generally preferableto underestimating the future potential. This strategy especially applies with respect toassessment of noise impacts. Too low of a forecast may allow compatibility conflicts that cannotlater be undone.The caveat to this methodology, as also stated in the Handbook, is that “activity projections must also bereasonable” and remain consistent with the role of the airport as envisioned by the airport owner.Policies in this Compatibility Plan are based on projected airport activity levels located in the airportmaster plan and ALP, and have been developed in accordance with the forecasting methodology guidancein the Handbook. Specific factors considered when determining the 20+ year future activity levels for theAirport are described in Chapter 4. Consistent with the Handbook, the forecast is at the high end of therange of activity likely to be reached during the 20+ year horizon that state law requires.1–6Brown Field Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility PlanJanuary 25, 2010
CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.4 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION1.4.1 General Plan ConsistencyAs noted previously, state law requires each local agency having jurisdiction over land uses within anALUC’s influence area to modify its general plans to be consistent with the compatibility plan. Theother option is to take steps to overrule all or part of an ALUC’s compatibility plan within 180 days ofwhen the ALUC adopts or amends it. If a local agency fails to take either action, it is required to submitall land use development actions involving property within the AIA to the ALUC for review (Pub. Util.Code §21676.5 (a)).The local agency may propose to overrule an ALUC’s compatibility plan after a hearing by a two-thirdsvote of its governing body if it makes specific findings that the local agency’s plans are consistent withthe intent of state airport land use planning statutes. The local agency must provide both the ALUC andthe Division of Aeronautics a copy of the local agency’s proposed decision and findings at least 45 daysin advance of its decision to overrule the ALUC and must hold a public hearing on the proposedoverruling (Pub. Util. Code §21676(a) and (b)). If the ALUC and the Division of Aeronautics choose toprovide comments to the local agency, they must do so within 30 days of receiving the proposed decisionand findings. All comments received from the ALUC or Division of Aeronautics must be included in thepublic record of the local agency’s final decision to overrule the ALUC (Pub. Util. Code §§21676,21676.5 and 21677). Similar requirements apply to a local agency’s decision to overrule the ALUC’sconsistency determinations for individual development proposals for which ALUC review is mandatory(Pub. Util. Code §21676.5(a)) and airport master plans (Pub. Util. Code §21676(c)).General plans do not need to be identical to an ALUC’s compatibility plan to be consistent. To meet theconsistency test, general plans must do two things:• Eliminate direct conflicts with compatibility planning criteria.• Establish procedures that implement and ensure compliance with compatibility policies.To do this, general plans must:• Delineate the compatibility criteria to be applied to individual land use actions.• Identify the mechanisms to be used to tie the applicable criteria to a particular development.• Indicate the procedures to be followed in review and approval of development actions affecting landswithin the AIA.Policy 2.9 in Chapter 2 contains additional information, including the methods local agencies can employto make general plans consistent with an ALUC’s compatibility plan.1-7Brown Field Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility PlanJanuary 25, 2010
Page 1: Brown Field Municipal AirportLand U
Page 15: San Diego County Regional Airport A
Page 18 and 19: TABLE OF CONTENTS BROWN FIELD MUNIC
Page 20 and 21: TABLE OF CONTENTS BROWN FIELD MUNIC
Page 23 and 24: 1Introduction1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE PL
Page 25 and 26: CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTIONthe vicinity o
Page 27: CHAPTER 1INTRODUCTION1.2.1 State La
Page 31: Chapter 2Airport Land UseCommission
Page 34 and 35: CHAPTER 2AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSIO
Page 65: Chapter 3Brown Field Municipal Airp
Page 68 and 69: CHAPTER 3BROWN FIELD MUNICIPAL AIRP
Page 78 and 79:
CHAPTER 3BROWN FIELD MUNICIPAL AIRP
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 131 and 132:
4.1 AIRPORT OVERVIEW4.1.1 Airport L
Page 133 and 134:
CHAPTER 4BACKGROUND DATA: BROWN FIE
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
CHAPTER 4LowerOtayReservoirECity of
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Brown Field Municipal Airport Land
Page 177 and 178:
Brown Field Municipal Airport Land
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181:
Appendix AState Laws Related toAirp
Page 184 and 185:
APPENDIX ASTATE LAWS RELATED TO AIR
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 243 and 244:
Appendix B14 Code of Federal Regula
Page 245 and 246:
APPENDIX B14 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULA
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261:
Appendix CAirport Land UseCompatibi
Page 264 and 265:
APPENDIX CAIRPORT LAND USE COMPATIB
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Page 290 and 291:
Page 293 and 294:
Appendix DMethods for Determining C
Page 295 and 296:
APPENDIX DMETHODS FOR DETERMINING C
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303:
Appendix EGeneral Plan Consistency
Page 306 and 307:
APPENDIX EGENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Page 308 and 309:
APPENDIX EGENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
Page 311 and 312:
Appendix FSample Implementation Doc
Page 313 and 314:
APPENDIX FSAMPLE IMPLEMENTATION DOC
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319:
Appendix GOn-Line Implementation To
Page 322 and 323:
APPENDIX GON-LINE IMPLEMENTATION TO
Page 325 and 326:
Appendix HGlossary of TermsIn addit
Page 327 and 328:
APPENDIX HGLOSSARY OF TERMSDisplace
Page 329 and 330:
APPENDIX HGLOSSARY OF TERMSNavigati
Page 331 and 332:
APPENDIX HGLOSSARY OF TERMSVisual F
Page 333:
Appendix ICorrespondence with theDi
Page 358:
and FAA directive.That said, we wil
show all

Brown Field Municipal Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?