13.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

in <strong>the</strong>ir countries is added reason to take specialsteps to ensure that <strong>the</strong>ir interests are not ignored.Indigenous peoples are generally described asnumbering around 300-370 million people withinup to 5,000 distinctive groups. In June 2006, <strong>the</strong>UN Human Rights Council adopted The Declarationon <strong>the</strong> Rights <strong>of</strong> Indigenous Peoples, drafting<strong>of</strong> which had begun in <strong>the</strong> 1980s. The definition<strong>of</strong> indigenous peoples has seen repeated amendment55 and remains contested, particularly on <strong>the</strong>African continent. This was a factor in <strong>the</strong> failure<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Declaration to meet UN General Assemblyapproval in November 2006.Focus on Indigenous Tenure SystemsMany indigenous lands have been and still aredeclared public or unoccupied because <strong>the</strong>y areheld collectively according to conceptions <strong>of</strong>ownership and access that do not fit well withimported property systems. This lack <strong>of</strong> statushas consequences for indigenous asset holdersand society at large and is a critical issue, globally,for property rights reform. In addressingproblems <strong>of</strong> land issues <strong>of</strong> indigenous peoplesaround <strong>the</strong> world, it is advantageous to focusupon indigenous land tenure systems ra<strong>the</strong>r thanon <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> indigenous people per se.This sidesteps <strong>the</strong> troubled definition as to whois and who is not ‘indigenous’ and has <strong>the</strong> addedadvantage <strong>of</strong> zeroing in on <strong>the</strong> systemic issues <strong>of</strong>indigenous or customary tenure regimes.Where ethnic and indigenous minorities areidentified and territorially placed, it maybe unnecessary to belabour distinctions between<strong>the</strong> indigenous and <strong>the</strong>ir tenure systems. In suchcases, it is advisable to simply promote <strong>the</strong>irterritorial autonomy and sovereignty. It shouldinclude <strong>the</strong>ir stewardship over natural resources,and extend to matters <strong>of</strong> property — and all withoutside intervention kept to a minimum. Focus onindigenous or customary tenure systems is criticalin <strong>the</strong> two regions where <strong>the</strong> poor are most numerous— Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia— and where delimitation and identification <strong>of</strong>indigenous peoples is difficult and contested.Important Numbers <strong>of</strong> Customary Land HoldersCustomary land holders comprise roughly two billionpeople in Africa, South East and South CentralAsia and Latin America and <strong>the</strong> Caribbean.Given that around 80 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se rural dwellersare defined as ‘poor’ — i.e., living onTable 3 Main Regions Where Customary Land Tenure Operates(Population figures are in millions)RegionsPopulation2005percentRuralNumberRuralpercentdefinedas poor*Number<strong>of</strong> poor2005Number <strong>of</strong>rural poorSub Saharan Africa 752 66 496 75 564 372North Africa 194 53 103 29 56 30South Central Asia 1615 70 1130 75 1211 848South East Asia 557 62 345 56 312 345Latin America and Caribbean 559 24 134 26 145 353,677 60 2,208 71 2,288 1,630Source <strong>of</strong> base fi gures: Population Census Bureau, 2005. 5679

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!