Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Foster Coalitions of Change in Favour of EquitableProperty Systems. Donors and international organisationscan engage with domestic groups — suchas businesses, NGOs and grassroots movements ofpeasants and small-business owners — and enlisttheir support for property rights reforms in contactwith governments. Depending on the circumstances,fostering coalitions of change by such practicesmay potentially bear fruit. Success requireslong-term commitment by the parties, a stronglocal ownership, wide stakeholder participationand good local management capacity. Donorcountries and multilateral institutions have animportant subsidiary role to play in areas of transnationalinformation gathering and distribution,education, and technical assistance. Multilateralorganisations have an important role to playin making the engagements of donor countriesmore coherent and coordinated and in providingstandards for intergovernmental peer review.Although there is now considerable awarenessof the importance of property rights for the poor,failure to appreciate the historical roots, complexity,and political nature of the underlying issuescan give rise to recommendations that maynot only fail to do justice to the topic but couldalso prove to be unsustainable.Capacity Building and Technical Assistance.Given the context-specificity and politicallysensitive nature of property issues and to makeservices in this area accessible to a majority ofthe population, there is a significant need forbuilding capacity on both the technical andanalytical levels within the public sector as wellas among other agents who can be mobilised. Inthis domain, the international community anddonor countries can provide trans-governmentalor multilaterally coordinated assistance in capacitybuilding leading to greater sustainabilityof reform programmes.Seed-financing of Property Reform. Functionalproperty systems are self-sustainable. Longstanding injection of aid from abroad would beseen as harmful to this goal or a symptom ofsystemic inadequacy. However, in the early stages,and depending on the context, many of theabove mentioned reforms might be triggered bya combination of technical assistance and seedfinancingfrom abroad. Such projects should beaccompanied by clear terms of reference as tothe timetable and phases on the path to selfsustainability.Cross-country Land Policy Indicators. Althoughthe importance is widely recognised, it is oftendifficult to integrate land rights into policy dialogueor to demonstrate the seriousness of anissue due to the lack of comparable indicators.Experience in other sectors has shown that defininga simple set of indicators, some of whichcould be generated by the land administrationsystem on a routine basis, could make it mucheasier to steer the policy dialogue towards criticalissues and at the same time to measureprogress over time. Such indicators should include:(1) coverage and accessibility of the system,potential and actual; (2) cost-effectivenessof service provision; (3) extent to which governmentholds or acquires land rights and the wayin which they are exercised, and (4) ways toaccess property through market and non-marketchannels.Ranking Systems of Property Rights Afforded toWomen. In the multilateral sphere, one possibleapproach to addressing the problem of discriminationof women in property matters would be toformulate a rigorous ranking system of propertyrights protection afforded to women. Such anindex/ranking may focus attention on how differentcountries score in terms of enforcement,protection, scope and depth of rights. Ranking113