13.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to achieve access to justice for <strong>the</strong> poor througha formal justice system, but <strong>the</strong> ideals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rule<strong>of</strong> law are an indispensable part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vision <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> legal empowerment agenda. Legal Empowerment<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Poor requires a society governed by<strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> law. While <strong>the</strong> ‘rule <strong>of</strong> law’ has differentmeanings in different contexts, US Justice AnthonyKennedy (a Commissioner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> CLEP) hasdefined <strong>the</strong> rule <strong>of</strong> law as requiring fidelity to principlesregarding law being superior and binding,non-discriminating, respectful <strong>of</strong> people, givingpeople voice and <strong>the</strong>ir human rights, and effective(see Textbox 1 for his and o<strong>the</strong>r definitions).Ra<strong>the</strong>r than attempting a comprehensive surveyor a tailor-made <strong>the</strong>oretical framework, this chapterfocuses on varying aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> access tojustice issue. Section 2 addresses a widespreadand so far underappreciated problem: many poorpeople lack any sort <strong>of</strong> legal identity or formallegal recognition, and as a result <strong>the</strong>y are completelyexcluded from <strong>the</strong> formal protections <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> state legal system and as beneficiaries <strong>of</strong>public goods and services. Section 3 turns to <strong>the</strong>basic challenge for our working group: How can<strong>the</strong> justness and fairness <strong>of</strong> what is delivered beimproved? How can <strong>the</strong> costs be reduced? Fourstrategies to improve access to justice are discussed.We start at <strong>the</strong> client end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supplychain with facilitating self-help and education.Then we move on to <strong>the</strong> provision <strong>of</strong> legal services,<strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> procedures that are bettersuited to legal needs and resources <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor,and <strong>the</strong> potential <strong>of</strong> informal justice.Box 1 <strong>Rule</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and JusticeThe rule <strong>of</strong> law (….) refers to a principle <strong>of</strong> governancein which all persons, institutions and entities,public and private, including <strong>the</strong> state itself, areaccountable to laws that are publicly promulgated,equally enforced and independently adjudicated, andwhich are consistent with international human rightsnorms and standards. It requires, as well, measures toensure adherence to <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> supremacy <strong>of</strong> law,equality before <strong>the</strong> law, accountability to <strong>the</strong> law, fairnessin <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> law, separation <strong>of</strong> powers,participation in decision-making, legal certainty,avoidance <strong>of</strong> arbitrariness, and procedural and legaltransparency.(…)“justice” is an ideal <strong>of</strong> accountability and fairnessin <strong>the</strong> protection and vindication <strong>of</strong> rights and <strong>the</strong>prevention and punishment <strong>of</strong> wrongs. Justice impliesregard for <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accused, for <strong>the</strong> interests <strong>of</strong>victims and for <strong>the</strong> well-being <strong>of</strong> society at large. It isa concept rooted in all national cultures and traditionsand, while its administration usually implies formaljudicial mechanisms, traditional dispute resolutionmechanisms are equally relevant. The internationalcommunity has worked to articulate collectively <strong>the</strong>substantive and procedural requirements for <strong>the</strong> administration<strong>of</strong> justice for more than half a century(<strong>Rule</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and Transitional Justice in Conflict andPost-Conflict Societies Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General;S/2004/616 <strong>of</strong> 23 August 2004).The <strong>Law</strong> is superior to, and thus binds, <strong>the</strong> governmentand all its <strong>of</strong>ficials.The <strong>Law</strong> affirms and protects <strong>the</strong> equality <strong>of</strong> all persons.By way <strong>of</strong> example only, <strong>the</strong> law may not dis-criminateagainst persons by reason <strong>of</strong> race, color, religion,or gender.The law must respect <strong>the</strong> dignity and preserve <strong>the</strong>human rights <strong>of</strong> all persons.The <strong>Law</strong> must establish and respect <strong>the</strong> constitutionalstructures necessary to secure a free and decent societyand to give all citizens a meaningful voice in formulatingand enacting <strong>the</strong> rules that govern <strong>the</strong>m.The <strong>Law</strong> must devise and maintain systems to adviseall persons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights and just expectations, andto empower <strong>the</strong>m to seek redress for grievances andfulfilment <strong>of</strong> just expectations without fear <strong>of</strong> penalty orretaliation. (Kennedy 2007).3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!