13.07.2015 Views

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

Download the file - United Nations Rule of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and grounded in conditions <strong>of</strong> freedom, securityand dignity. It has four pillars (a) fundamentalprinciples and rights at work under internationallabour standards; (b) employment and incomeopportunities; (c) social protection and socialsecurity, and (d) social dialogue and tripartism.Informal workforce: who are wetalking about?The vast majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> poor earn <strong>the</strong>ir living in<strong>the</strong> informal economy where average earnings arelow, productivity poor, working conditions hazardous,and risks high. Section 3 provides a globalpicture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> informal economy, highlighting itssize, segmentation, and vulnerabilities. Womendominate <strong>the</strong> most-disadvantaged categories <strong>of</strong>informal work, notably industrial outwork andhome-based production. It is also in <strong>the</strong> informaleconomy where child labour and bonded labourare most prevalent, and where indigenous andtribal peoples are marginalized largely by discrimination.Despite early predictions <strong>of</strong> its eventualdemise, <strong>the</strong> informal economy continues to grow.Poverty and labour rights: Towards aGlobal Social ContractSection 4 describes a new departure in <strong>the</strong>international community regarding labour rightsand <strong>the</strong> informal economy; it features threenoteworthy elements: <strong>the</strong> Fundamental Principlesand Rights at Work from 1998; <strong>the</strong> DecentWork Agenda, first introduced in 1999, and <strong>the</strong>2002 Strategy for Labour Rights in <strong>the</strong> informaleconomy. These elements are gaining increasingsupport from a broad coalition <strong>of</strong> governments,international organisations, various employersand trade unions, as well as from non-governmentalorganisations.As part <strong>of</strong> efforts to achieve <strong>the</strong> MillenniumDevelopment Goals (MDGs), <strong>the</strong> 2005 WorldSummit <strong>of</strong> Heads <strong>of</strong> States agreed to make fulland productive employment and decent workfor all a central objective <strong>of</strong> both national andinternational policies and national developmentand poverty reduction strategies. In 2006 thiswas followed by <strong>the</strong> UN Economic and SocialCouncil’s Ministerial Declaration, which emphasisedfull and productive employment and decentwork for all as an end in itself and a means toachieve <strong>the</strong> MDGs. The Decent Work Agenda has<strong>the</strong>refore been accepted as a global aim; it nolonger remains an ILO agenda alone. Decent workhas been declared a goal not only for <strong>the</strong> formalwage sector, but also for <strong>the</strong> informal economy.Growing recognition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for labour rightsto catalyse employment creation in <strong>the</strong> informaleconomy, while protecting its workers, has ledto an emerging global social contract, creating abroad agenda for reform and for empowerment.The economics <strong>of</strong> informality and <strong>the</strong>debate on labour regulationsFor <strong>the</strong> working poor, it is not <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong>economic activity that is <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>irpoverty, but <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir economic activities.The link between work <strong>of</strong> low quality, orproductivity, and poverty is clear: if people earnedmore, poverty would decline. In Section 5, wereview research on <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> labour regulationin setting economic and social goals, and wedraw two major conclusions. First, we suggestcaution in interpreting this research, particularly<strong>the</strong> cross-country studies. Caution shouldalso be exercised before translating <strong>the</strong> findingsinto country-level policy interventions withoutfirst considering country-specific conditions, <strong>the</strong>heterogeneity in <strong>the</strong> regulatory environment andemployment arrangements. Secondly, as a policyconclusion, we suggest a shift <strong>of</strong> focus from <strong>the</strong>prevailing ideological question on regulation-versus-deregulationto questions about how regula-131

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!