13.07.2015 Views

A literary history of Persia

A literary history of Persia

A literary history of Persia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

S7R WILLIAM JONES 49whence, after a stay <strong>of</strong> two days, he returned, by way <strong>of</strong>Wickham, Portsmouth, and London, to Gravesend, where heembarked for Ostend on February I4th. He finally reachedParis on March 14, 1762, and on the following day at lengthdeposited his manuscripts at the Bibliotheque du Roi.The appearance <strong>of</strong> Anquetil's work in 1771 was far fromat once convincing the whole learned world <strong>of</strong> the greatservices which he had rendered to science. InReception <strong>of</strong> , /- > i i /- 1-1Anquetudu place <strong>of</strong> the wisdom expected from a sage likePerron's work. _ .....,Zoroaster, who, even in classical times, enjoyedso great a reputation for pr<strong>of</strong>ound philosophic thought, thecurious and the learnedwere confronted with what appearedto them to be a farrago <strong>of</strong> puerile fables, tedious formulae,wearisome repetitions, and grotesque prescriptions. The11^jS*lettergeneral disappointment (which, indeed, Anquetilhad himself foreseen and foretold, pp. i-ii),found its most ferocious expression in the famous<strong>of</strong> Sir William Jones, at that time a young graduate <strong>of</strong>Oxford. 1 This letter, written in French on the model <strong>of</strong>Voltaire,will be found at the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth volume(pp. 583-613) <strong>of</strong> his works (London, 1799). It was pennedin 1771, the year in which Anquetil's work appeared, and isequally remarkable for the vigour and grace <strong>of</strong> its style, andthe deplorable violence and injustice <strong>of</strong> its contents. Thewriter's fastidious taste was <strong>of</strong>fended by Anquetil's prolixityand lack <strong>of</strong> style ;while his anger was kindled by the somewhategotistic strain which, it must be admitted, runs throughthe narrative portion <strong>of</strong> his work, and by certain <strong>of</strong> his reflectionson the English in general and the learned doctors <strong>of</strong>Oxford in particular ;and he suffered himself to be so blindedby these sentiments that he not only overwhelmed Anquetilwith satire and invective which nre not always in the best1He was at this time about twenty-five years <strong>of</strong> age, a Fellow <strong>of</strong>University College, and a B.A. <strong>of</strong> three years' standing. He died in 1794,at the age <strong>of</strong> forty-eight.5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!