13.07.2015 Views

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 4.1 Autonomous okrugs <strong>and</strong> their ‘mother’ regionsName of theAutonomousOkrug‘Mother’RegionOkrug’sCapitalArea(sq. km)Okrug’s Population/(Place With<strong>in</strong>the <strong>Russia</strong>nFederation)Ag<strong>in</strong>skii Chita Oblast Ag<strong>in</strong>skoe 19,000 72,213/(84)BuryatskiiChukotskii N/A Anadyr 737,700 53,824/(85)Yevenkiiskii Krasnoyarsk Krai Tura 767,600 17,697/(89)Khanty-Mansiskii Tyumen Oblast Khanty- 523,100 1,432,817/(36)MasiiskKomi-Permyatskii Perm Oblast Kudymkar 32,900 136,076/(82)Koraykskii Kamchatka Oblast Palana 301,500 25,157/(88)Nenetskii Arkhangel’sk Naryan-Mar 176,700 41,546/(86)OblastTaimyrskii Krasnoyarsk Krai Dud<strong>in</strong>ka 862,100 39,786/(87)Ust’-Ordynskii Irkutsk Oblast Ust’-Orda 22,400 135,327/(83)BuraytskiiYamalo-Nenetskii Tyumen Oblast Salekhard 750,300 507,000/(72)Source: Compiled by the author.Unification as a political project 83processes, <strong>and</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g political rhetoric are not the only signs of defederalization.The tendency to revise the state adm<strong>in</strong>istrative structure by reduc<strong>in</strong>gthe number of federation subjects fully fits with this approach. Therehave been numerous <strong>in</strong>itiatives aimed at reduc<strong>in</strong>g the number of subjects ofthe federation through regional mergers. Some of them have come <strong>in</strong>to be<strong>in</strong>g(see Table 4.2 for the mergers’ timel<strong>in</strong>e), others (such as the mergers ofTyumen Oblast <strong>and</strong> Yamalo-Nenetskii <strong>and</strong> Khanty-Mansiskii autonomousokrugs, or the mergers of Arkhangelsk Oblast <strong>and</strong> Nenetskii AutonomousOkrug) have been more problematic, <strong>and</strong> the f<strong>in</strong>al outcome is still unclear.However, mergers of federal subjects have required amendments to federallegislation. In December 2001, the constitutional Law, ‘On the Process ofAccession to the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation <strong>and</strong> Foundation of a New ConstituentUnit of the <strong>Russia</strong>n Federation’, was adopted. 5 This law regulates the conditions<strong>and</strong> procedures for mergers. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the law, only neighbour<strong>in</strong>gfederation subjects are permitted to <strong>in</strong>itiate merger procedures. There aretwo possible outcomes of a merger: two federation subjects (A <strong>and</strong> B) couldmerge <strong>and</strong> create a new subject of the federation (A + B = C), or one subjectof the federation could <strong>in</strong>corporate another without creat<strong>in</strong>g a new subject(A + B = A). The law also requires federation subjects <strong>in</strong>terested <strong>in</strong> a mergerto hold a referendum, but only the President can place before the StateDuma the draft law required to <strong>in</strong>stitute a new merged subject of the federation.The ma<strong>in</strong> thrust of this chapter is an exam<strong>in</strong>ation of Put<strong>in</strong>’s new policy ofmerg<strong>in</strong>g federal subjects with a focus on the first new federal subject toemerge from such a merger, Permskii Krai. The choice of this particular case

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!