Federalism and Local Politics in Russia
Federalism and Local Politics in Russia
Federalism and Local Politics in Russia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Federal discourses, m<strong>in</strong>ority rights, <strong>and</strong> conflict transformation 65associations, yet the Law ‘On Political Parties’ (2001) forbids the formationof parties on ethnic grounds. Contradictions between the formal equality of<strong>Russia</strong>n citizens <strong>and</strong> the actual implementation of laws or the effects of<strong>in</strong>consequential legal norms often allow for de facto discrim<strong>in</strong>ation of nondom<strong>in</strong>antgroups. De jure there is a freedom of movement <strong>in</strong>side the <strong>Russia</strong>nFederation. 39 De facto, however, this freedom of movement is restricted bythe local registry offices – very often to the detriment of non-<strong>Russia</strong>ns. 40 TheLaw ‘On Forcibly Displaced Persons’ (1993) does not extend to Chechensbecause they are not recognized as victims of ethnic, confessional or politicalmistreatment. 41The <strong>in</strong>digenous people of the high North, Siberia <strong>and</strong> Far East are mostlynomads or semi-nomads, who are socio-economically disadvantaged, weakly<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the society at large, <strong>and</strong> badly prepared for the transition to amarket economy. The declared aim is to protect them from forced assimilationas well as to assist their economic well-be<strong>in</strong>g. 42 In the past, the smaller<strong>in</strong>digenous peoples received material support mostly from the regions.Currently they chiefly depend on federal assistance. The <strong>in</strong>digenous peoplearticulate requests for the preferential exploitation of their natural environment(mostly hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g rights), <strong>and</strong> they would like to preservetheir traditional lifestyle, especially aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>in</strong>roads of oil <strong>and</strong> gas companies.In the past they also dem<strong>and</strong>ed quotas for political representation <strong>in</strong>regional parliaments, <strong>in</strong> public offices <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the federal government, forexample by ask<strong>in</strong>g to form a ‘Public Chamber’ of organizations of ethnicm<strong>in</strong>orities. 43 The Soviet quota system for the promotion of ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities<strong>in</strong> higher education has been abolished, <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stitutionalized system of‘affirmative action’ no longer exists. 44 Yet the <strong>in</strong>digenous people are entitledto special representation <strong>in</strong> local representative bodies by the demarcation ofelectoral districts <strong>in</strong> their favour <strong>in</strong> areas of their compact settlements. Theregions or bodies of local self-government may also <strong>in</strong>troduce quotas for therepresentation of <strong>in</strong>digenous communities <strong>in</strong> their respective representativebodies or they may form specific consultative bodies <strong>in</strong> their respectiveadm<strong>in</strong>istrations. 45 Traditional ownership of l<strong>and</strong> or rights of l<strong>and</strong> use is alsorecognized. The small <strong>in</strong>digenous peoples receive some assistance for thepreservation of their way of production; they may also be granted preferentialtaxation rights <strong>and</strong> privileged use of public property.Representatives of <strong>in</strong>digenous people may participate <strong>in</strong> the elaboration ofstructural programmes that affect their traditional areas of liv<strong>in</strong>g. Anotherlaw allows the <strong>in</strong>digenous people to form voluntary associations. 46De facto, however, the rights of <strong>in</strong>digenous people are far less protectedthan this list of rights would suggest. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of ascrib<strong>in</strong>g the status‘small people’ or the terms under which <strong>in</strong>dividuals may belong to such agroup are not clarified. The term ‘traditional way of production’ is alsounder dispute. The ‘property rights’ of <strong>in</strong>dividuals or <strong>in</strong>digenous communitieswith respect to l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> soil are likewise contested. Even a m<strong>in</strong>imalrepresentation of <strong>in</strong>digenous people <strong>in</strong> local or regional representative bodies