13.07.2015 Views

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Federal discourses, m<strong>in</strong>ority rights, <strong>and</strong> conflict transformation 65associations, yet the Law ‘On Political Parties’ (2001) forbids the formationof parties on ethnic grounds. Contradictions between the formal equality of<strong>Russia</strong>n citizens <strong>and</strong> the actual implementation of laws or the effects of<strong>in</strong>consequential legal norms often allow for de facto discrim<strong>in</strong>ation of nondom<strong>in</strong>antgroups. De jure there is a freedom of movement <strong>in</strong>side the <strong>Russia</strong>nFederation. 39 De facto, however, this freedom of movement is restricted bythe local registry offices – very often to the detriment of non-<strong>Russia</strong>ns. 40 TheLaw ‘On Forcibly Displaced Persons’ (1993) does not extend to Chechensbecause they are not recognized as victims of ethnic, confessional or politicalmistreatment. 41The <strong>in</strong>digenous people of the high North, Siberia <strong>and</strong> Far East are mostlynomads or semi-nomads, who are socio-economically disadvantaged, weakly<strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong>to the society at large, <strong>and</strong> badly prepared for the transition to amarket economy. The declared aim is to protect them from forced assimilationas well as to assist their economic well-be<strong>in</strong>g. 42 In the past, the smaller<strong>in</strong>digenous peoples received material support mostly from the regions.Currently they chiefly depend on federal assistance. The <strong>in</strong>digenous peoplearticulate requests for the preferential exploitation of their natural environment(mostly hunt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> fish<strong>in</strong>g rights), <strong>and</strong> they would like to preservetheir traditional lifestyle, especially aga<strong>in</strong>st the <strong>in</strong>roads of oil <strong>and</strong> gas companies.In the past they also dem<strong>and</strong>ed quotas for political representation <strong>in</strong>regional parliaments, <strong>in</strong> public offices <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the federal government, forexample by ask<strong>in</strong>g to form a ‘Public Chamber’ of organizations of ethnicm<strong>in</strong>orities. 43 The Soviet quota system for the promotion of ethnic m<strong>in</strong>orities<strong>in</strong> higher education has been abolished, <strong>and</strong> an <strong>in</strong>stitutionalized system of‘affirmative action’ no longer exists. 44 Yet the <strong>in</strong>digenous people are entitledto special representation <strong>in</strong> local representative bodies by the demarcation ofelectoral districts <strong>in</strong> their favour <strong>in</strong> areas of their compact settlements. Theregions or bodies of local self-government may also <strong>in</strong>troduce quotas for therepresentation of <strong>in</strong>digenous communities <strong>in</strong> their respective representativebodies or they may form specific consultative bodies <strong>in</strong> their respectiveadm<strong>in</strong>istrations. 45 Traditional ownership of l<strong>and</strong> or rights of l<strong>and</strong> use is alsorecognized. The small <strong>in</strong>digenous peoples receive some assistance for thepreservation of their way of production; they may also be granted preferentialtaxation rights <strong>and</strong> privileged use of public property.Representatives of <strong>in</strong>digenous people may participate <strong>in</strong> the elaboration ofstructural programmes that affect their traditional areas of liv<strong>in</strong>g. Anotherlaw allows the <strong>in</strong>digenous people to form voluntary associations. 46De facto, however, the rights of <strong>in</strong>digenous people are far less protectedthan this list of rights would suggest. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of ascrib<strong>in</strong>g the status‘small people’ or the terms under which <strong>in</strong>dividuals may belong to such agroup are not clarified. The term ‘traditional way of production’ is alsounder dispute. The ‘property rights’ of <strong>in</strong>dividuals or <strong>in</strong>digenous communitieswith respect to l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> soil are likewise contested. Even a m<strong>in</strong>imalrepresentation of <strong>in</strong>digenous people <strong>in</strong> local or regional representative bodies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!