13.07.2015 Views

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

Federalism and Local Politics in Russia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Between a rock <strong>and</strong> a hard place 515 For complete texts, see W. R. Batsell, Soviet Rule <strong>in</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>, New York: TheMacmillan Company, 1929, pp. 79–82.6 V. Aspaturian, ‘The theory <strong>and</strong> practice of Soviet federalism’, The Journal of<strong>Politics</strong>, Vol. 12, 1950, fn. 15, referr<strong>in</strong>g to Len<strong>in</strong>’s Collected Works, XXII, p. 26.7 Aspaturian, p. 26.8 Ibid.9 ‘Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, 1977’, Articles 3, 6 <strong>and</strong> 108 <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>er, pp. 149<strong>and</strong> 175.10 See L. G. Churchward, Contemporary Soviet Government, London: Routledge<strong>and</strong> Kegan Paul, revised second edition, 1975, p. 167.11 M. Filippov, P. C. Ordeshook <strong>and</strong> O. Shvetsova, Design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Federalism</strong>: A Theoryof Self-Susta<strong>in</strong>able Federal Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2004, p. 89.12 W. H. Riker, <strong>Federalism</strong>: Orig<strong>in</strong>, Operation, Significance, Boston, MA: Little,Brown <strong>and</strong> Company, 1964, p. 13.13 Ibid., pp. 13–14.14 C. J. Friedrich, Trends of <strong>Federalism</strong> <strong>in</strong> Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice, New York: Praeger,1968, p. 49.15 Filippov et al., pp.92–3.16 G. Smith, ‘Federation, defederation <strong>and</strong> refederation: from the Soviet Union to<strong>Russia</strong>n statehood’, <strong>in</strong> G. Smith (ed.), <strong>Federalism</strong>: The Multiethnic Challenge,London: Longman, 1995, Ch. 6, pp. 159–60.17 Filippov et al., p.92.18 Smith, p. 162.19 Ibid., p. 163.20 R. Sakwa, ‘From revolution to krizis: the transcend<strong>in</strong>g revolutions of 1989–91’,Comparative <strong>Politics</strong>, Vol. 38, No 4, July 2006, p. 462.21 Ibid., p. 465.22 The detailed events <strong>and</strong> developments of the period 1991-93 that led up to theformal adoption of <strong>Russia</strong>’s first post-communist Constitution <strong>in</strong> December 1993are ably summarized <strong>in</strong> C. Ross, <strong>Federalism</strong> <strong>and</strong> Democratisation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>,Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002, Ch. 2, pp. 17–28.23 See C. Ross, ‘<strong>Russia</strong>’s mult<strong>in</strong>ational federation: from constitutional to contractfederalism <strong>and</strong> the ‘“war of laws <strong>and</strong> sovereignties”’, <strong>in</strong> M. Burgess <strong>and</strong> J. P<strong>in</strong>der(eds), Mult<strong>in</strong>ational Federations, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 108–26.24 A. He<strong>in</strong>emann-Grüder, ‘Why did <strong>Russia</strong> not break apart? Legacies, actors, <strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> <strong>Russia</strong>’s federalism’, <strong>in</strong> A. He<strong>in</strong>emann-Grüder (ed.), <strong>Federalism</strong>Doomed? European <strong>Federalism</strong> Between Integration <strong>and</strong> Separation, Oxford:Berghahn Books, 2002, p. 153.25 Ibid., p. 151.26 See P. K<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>Federalism</strong> <strong>and</strong> Federation, Beckenham: Croom Helm, 1982.27 M. Burgess, Comparative <strong>Federalism</strong> <strong>in</strong> Theory <strong>and</strong> Practice, London: Routledge,2006, p. 2.28 He<strong>in</strong>emann-Grüder, p. 153.29 Ronald Watts remarked thatsignificant characteristics of federal processes <strong>in</strong>clude a strong predispositionto democracy s<strong>in</strong>ce they presume the voluntary consent of citizens <strong>in</strong> theconstituent units, non-centralisation as a pr<strong>in</strong>ciple expressed through multiplecentres of political decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g, open political barga<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, – … theoperation of checks <strong>and</strong> balances to avoid the concentration of power <strong>and</strong> arespect for constitutionalism.(Compar<strong>in</strong>g Federal Systems, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University,2nd edition, 1999, p. 14)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!