05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 PIS'ICIDE MANAGEMENT AND HPM IN SOUIIIiAST ASIA<br />

Phililpines with varying results. Trials in collaboration with the regional Crop<br />

Protection Centers in the Philippines showed a 3.3% increase in net return with<br />

61% succcssful cases (Waibel I 986a). Litsingcr (1984) reviewed results from<br />

trial, comparing prophylactic treatmlents with ETs during the period 1976 to<br />

1983, <strong>and</strong> found that overall, 52% of the cascs were successful, when data for all<br />

pests were averaged, with a range from 29% (rice whorl maggot) to 71%<br />

(case\vworml).<br />

Rola <strong>and</strong> Kenmore (1986), in a study in Laguna, found a considerable<br />

increase in net return with a high proportion of successful cases (Table 1).<br />

In addition to the criteria used in Table 1, Icchnology such as economic<br />

thresholds has also to be viewed from the perspective of risk. Risk i,;often<br />

measured in terms of' the st<strong>and</strong>ard dcviation of net returns, with the assumption<br />

that net returns are normally distributed. In Figure 1, it becomes obvious that<br />

the ET technology increases average nci returns along with an increase in<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation. This means that farmers have to 'pay'for the benefits<br />

obtained by Iollowing economic thresholds in terms of a higher risk. For<br />

example, in the 'hilippins (P. Kenmore, unpublishcd), for a S25 increase in net<br />

return farmers would have to 'pay' merely $2 in st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation, while in<br />

Thail<strong>and</strong> the ratio is almost 1:1. The practical implications are as follows: in a<br />

given location a number of ftarmiers are doing perfectly well with thresholds,<br />

while others are not. It might be (uite realistic to assume that fariers will look<br />

at a number of early adopters before they decide to practice ETs by themselves.<br />

It has been hypothesized, however, that fariners in developing countries are<br />

only moderately risk averse, <strong>and</strong> would be willing to 'pay'two uniLs of st<strong>and</strong>ard<br />

deviation for one unit in increased net returns (Ryan 1979). If we apply this<br />

rule, the ET technology would seem to be accclptable under risk considerations.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, wc find that while economic thresholds increase farmers'<br />

profils, they do not significantly increase yields (Rola <strong>and</strong> Kenmore 1986).<br />

LiLsinger (1984) concluded that Philippine rice production could be maintained at<br />

Table 1. Economic assessment of economic thresholds in rice in two Southeast<br />

Asian countries.<br />

Country/(Sotrce)<br />

Thai l<strong>and</strong> m<br />

Average increase of'<br />

fanners' net return(%)<br />

Percent of<br />

succssful cases<br />

ta<br />

Philippines<br />

4.2 80<br />

(Waibel 1986a) t' 3.3 61<br />

(Litsinger 19 84 )c<br />

52<br />

(Rola & Kenmore 1986)11 7.6<br />

!'Results<br />

82<br />

of 40 farmers' fields 1985 dry season. bResults of 58 farmers' fields<br />

1980-1981 dry <strong>and</strong> wet seasons. cCompared with prophylactic<br />

dResults<br />

treatments.<br />

of 22 farmers fields 1986 wet season.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!