05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IM ACI'IV1IS OF1TI III 111.1 11NI t-GIMAN CO'ITON PROJECt' 163<br />

weevils are attracted to okra <strong>and</strong> the cotton gains up to three weeks in which<br />

bolls can be set without flower weevil influence. Later on A. lata apparently<br />

overcomes the okra barrier <strong>and</strong> colonizes tie cotton fields.<br />

MANAGEMENT OF COTTON BOLLWORM<br />

The previously described technologies against two key pests of cotton lead<br />

to a considerable delay in the need to apply pesticides. This contributes to a<br />

more favorable environment for arthropod predators capable of limiting cotton<br />

bollworm to low population levels. I lowcver, these predators are commonly<br />

absent or present only in low numbers, making it necessary to develop integrated<br />

control strategies for this most destructive of all the Philippine cotton pests.<br />

Cultural Control Strategies<br />

11. armigera is a highly polyphigous insect known as a pest to such diverse<br />

crops as maize, sorghun, ton.:.to, tobacco, <strong>and</strong> cotton. It was observed that<br />

given a choice, iIliothis wofuld prefer some host plants over others. Cotton<br />

does not secm to be its favorite crop. Tobacco <strong>and</strong> maize appeared to be<br />

considerably more attractive.<br />

TRAP CROPS Single rows of Irap crops can be intcrcropped at intervals of<br />

15-20 rows of cotton. Ileliothis females seirching for suitable host plants are<br />

then diverted away front the main crop. On some trap crops, e.g., maize,<br />

bollworn larvae cannibalize each other in the major feeding site at the tip of the<br />

corn car. On trap rows of tobacco the larvae are easily spotted through their<br />

feeding damage. They canl be h<strong>and</strong>pickcd as the farmcr inspects the few tobacco<br />

rows. Figure 4 demonstrates the high attractivity of tobacco rows within a<br />

cotton field.<br />

In the tobacco-cotton intercrop, three times the number of eggs were<br />

deposited on tobacco terminals than on comparable sampling areas on the cotton<br />

plants. Ilowevcr, the total number of leliothis eggs per season found in the<br />

intercrop was not si~,nificnntly diffCrent from those found in cotton monoculture.<br />

It was noted tht all host plants were generally more attractive to lleliothis<br />

females in the early reproductive stages. Some crops such as maize <strong>and</strong> sorghum<br />

lose their appeal abruptly after flowering. It is therefore vital to time the<br />

planting dates of the different crops so that they enter their respective<br />

reproductive plmse simultaneously. Only then can cotton be expected to benefit<br />

through a delay il the nccd for pesticide a lplication. In the example given in<br />

Figure 4, tobacco seedlings were transplanted right after planting cotton. The<br />

first pesticide application in the intercrop was delayed by two weeks as compared<br />

to the first treatment of the monoculture. On average, the tobacco-cotton system<br />

receivcd 2.5 sprays per season versus 6.5 sprays on cotton alone.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!