05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

166 I'I:S'1CIDFMANAGIFMI'NT AND IPM INSOUIViEASI' ASIA<br />

Table 6. Conventional critical levels for major cotton pests in the Philippincs. a<br />

<strong>Pest</strong> Days after<br />

phuming<br />

Sampling<br />

unil b<br />

Critical level<br />

lollworm 28-56 terminal less than 17 out of 20<br />

larvae uninfested<br />

56-112 terminal less than 18 out of 20<br />

uninfested<br />

56-126 2nd branch less than 18 out of 20<br />

uninfested<br />

Lealhopper 28-112 3rd leaf less than 10 out of 20<br />

uninfested <strong>and</strong> undamaged<br />

"Critical levels for minor pests are provided on the field technician's sampling<br />

cards. Sampling is optional. 'Terninal: top 20 cmn of plant main stern, 2nd<br />

rmnch: the secor; aranch below the plant terminal, 3rd leaf: Third leaf below<br />

)lant lip.<br />

Table 7. ('oiparison of treatment decisions using peg.-board <strong>and</strong> technician's<br />

sampling cards in the same colton fields."<br />

Decision not to spray Dec ision to spray<br />

Peg-board 13.1% 86.9%<br />

Sampling card 19.2% 80.8%<br />

"bascd on 99 independent samples each.<br />

populations (termed farmers' friends) in pest management decisions. Table 7<br />

shows how the two sampling nethods compare with regards to spray decisions.<br />

Oi the assumption that the sanplcd fields really needed treatment (more<br />

than 80% d(cidCd so inl both techniques), the decisions not to spray were<br />

obviously erroneous. However, both systems were originally based on<br />

sequential sampling plans designed to tolerate an error of 20% in order to reduce<br />

the number of samples needed (Sterling 1976b). In any case, the basic critical<br />

levels have been determined conservatively, i.e. to result in a treatment decision<br />

earlier than a truly "economic" threshold level would prescribe. This means that<br />

the apparently erroneous decisions not to spray in Table 7,even if implemented,<br />

would not lead to an economic loss. Farmers <strong>and</strong> technicians alike are extremely<br />

sensitive to such crrors. It was found to be considerably easier to allow a few<br />

more spray decisions to inspire confidence in the system, <strong>and</strong> then gradually<br />

acquaint the users with the principles of integrated pcst management.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!