05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SAMPLING METIODS FOR PEST SURVEILLANCE INRICE 119<br />

Table 2. Regression models to predict the mean brown planthopper (BPH)<br />

density from the proportion of sample units with at least n hoppers.<br />

Dependent variablea Regression model Predicted proportion<br />

corresponding to ETb<br />

Proportion of sample y = 0.603 '4 - 0.079 R + 0.012 (>1)<br />

units with at least r = 0.96 N = 44<br />

1 BP1<br />

Proportion of sample y = 0.649 i-- 0.077 R - 0.265 (>1)<br />

uniLs with at least r = 0.98 N = 44<br />

2 BPH<br />

Proportion of sample y = 0.548 )/I-- 0.055 R- 0.314 0.87<br />

units with at least r = 0.98 N = 44<br />

3 BPH<br />

Proportion of sample y = 0.427 'Ii- 0.033 Y - 0.290 0.73<br />

uniLs with at least r = 0.97 N = 44<br />

4BPH<br />

alndependent variable always: __<br />

mean number brown planthopper/sample unit; bET<br />

= economic threshold = 10 BPH/sample unit.<br />

The second option consists of an alternative definition of "proportion<br />

infested units". Instead of relating the mean number of hoppers per sample unit<br />

to tile proportion of units with at least one insect, it might as well be related to<br />

the proportion of units with at least 2, 3, or 4 insects. In this way, the<br />

enumerative sampling cannot be substituted completely but the expenditure for<br />

cotnting may a: least be ininimized.<br />

Table 2 shows the regression models for the relationship between the mean<br />

number of hoppers per unit <strong>and</strong> the proportion of units with at least 1,2, 3, or 4<br />

hoppers, respectively. The last column of Table 2 gives the criterion for<br />

evaluating [lie practicability of the models with regard to binomial sequential<br />

sampling. Hence, sampling plans based on either model (3)or (4)will be tested.<br />

SAMPLING FOR LEAFFOLDER<br />

All attempts to work out a preseuce-absence sampling method for leaffolder<br />

(Cnaphalocrocis nedinalis) have so far failed. The available information<br />

indicates that probably only fundamental changes in the present surveillance<br />

system could make such a method possible, namely, either by reducing the 10<br />

tiller sample unit to one tiller or sampling larvae instead of damaged leaves.<br />

Both alternatives would make the surveillance system more complicated, rather<br />

than simpler. Therefore, a sequential sampling plan which requires counting of<br />

damaged leaves was determined.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!