05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AN APPROACH TO INTEGRATED PEST<br />

MANAGEMENT: ACTIVITIES OF THE PHILIPPINE.<br />

GERMAN COTTON PROJECT<br />

V. Hasse*, A. Drews, R. Coraics, <strong>and</strong> A. Querubin<br />

Philippine-German Cotton Project, c/o GTZ<br />

71h. Floor Teza Towers, Herrera St.<br />

Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines<br />

(*Present address: Burmese-Gennan Plant Protection Project<br />

c/o German Embassy Rangoon, Postbox 1148<br />

5300 Bonn 1,Federal Republic of Germany)<br />

Cotton-growing in the Philippines has historically been constrained by<br />

serious pest problems. Early attempts to introduce 1hreshold levels (Disu 1980)<br />

were ab<strong>and</strong>oned by the Philippine Cotton Corporation in favor of scheduled<br />

pesticide application. However, the resultant high pest control costs were<br />

coupled with only moderate yields <strong>and</strong> it became obvious that a mole economic<br />

approach to pest management was needed (Daxl 1980).<br />

The post complex of cotton in the Philippines consists of 30 described<br />

arthropod pests of cotton, of which 12 occur regularly (Schmutterer 1978) <strong>and</strong> 3<br />

may be described as key pests . When the Philippine-German Cotton Project<br />

started in 1981, it was apparent that to be successful, any integrated pest<br />

management system needed a holistic approach, simplified enough to enable<br />

small farmers to underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> adopt the approach.<br />

Research concentrated on cultural control programs to which farmers could<br />

relate, coupled with redesigned biocontrol methods appropriate to village<br />

technology. These were supported by IPM-based rapid, accurate sampling<br />

methods which were initially used by field technicians <strong>and</strong> subsequently adapted<br />

for farmers' use as a guide in spraying decisions.<br />

Since many pest outbreaks in cetton have been attributed to secondary pests<br />

or resurgent minor pests (Huffaker 1980), research focussed mainly on integrated<br />

control of the three key pests Ainrasca biguitula(Shir.), the cotton leafhopper;<br />

Arnorphoidea lata Motsch., the cotton flower weevil; <strong>and</strong> lleliothis armigera<br />

(Jib.), the cotton bollworm.<br />

MANAGEMENT OF COTTON LEAFHOPPER<br />

Deltapine 16 gave the best yields<br />

varieties,<br />

of the introduced<br />

but it was highly<br />

American<br />

susceptible<br />

cotton<br />

to<br />

not<br />

Arnrasca<br />

occur in<br />

biguttula,a<br />

North America.<br />

pest which<br />

A. bigiulathrives<br />

does<br />

on glabrous (hairless) cotton<br />

leaves, feeding on<br />

the underside of the leaves between the veins. It is usually<br />

most severe early in the season. Symptoms of "hopperburn', a discoloration <strong>and</strong><br />

curling of the leaves caused by the leafhopper's toxic saliva, frequently leads to<br />

yield losses or total destruction of the crop.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!