05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1'ESTICIDE RISISTANCE PROBLEMS IN TIIAILAND 283<br />

monogenic (or monofactorial resistance) or polygenic (or polyfactorial<br />

resistance).<br />

RESEARCI NEEDED<br />

Detection of the Resistant Strain<br />

Failures in field application of pesticides may often be due to reasons other<br />

than the development of resistance. And conversely, although one strain of a<br />

pest may have developed resistance, that does not necessarily mean that field<br />

failures will occur. Ingeneral, the only way to confirm resistance is to compare<br />

the sensitivity of a sample to a control. The most common method for detecting<br />

resistant strains is to use increasing doses of pesticides to determine the<br />

relationship between (lose of toxicant <strong>and</strong> mortality. Regression analysis will<br />

then give the LD 50 value from the derived equation. The level of resistance may<br />

be quantified as a Resistance Index, calculated as<br />

L.D5 0 of resistant strain<br />

LD 50 of susceptible strain<br />

In some cases resistance may be dletermined using bioassays or biochemical<br />

methods, assuming the mechanism of resistance is well accepted. The enzymes<br />

involved may be hydrolases, carboxylesterases or Gusathione-S-transferase<br />

(Miyata ct al. 1985, Oppenoorth & Welling 1976). An electrophoretic technique<br />

is often used in the rapid detection of resistance in the brown planthopper in<br />

Japan.<br />

Identification of the Level of Resistance<br />

After the level of resistance has been identified as discussed above, then it<br />

would be feasible to proceed with mapping the level of resistance among the<br />

colonies collected from different locations. This is the most important area for<br />

which research is urgently needed.<br />

Unfortunately, there are few Thai toxicologists or entomologists who are<br />

working on this aspect of the pesticide resistance phenomenon. There is a lot to<br />

challenge Thai researchers, in addition to the research needed on the mechanisms<br />

of resistance <strong>and</strong> the development of cross resistance in the key pests in the<br />

country.<br />

CONCLUDING REMARKS<br />

For serious pests of crucifcrous crop <strong>and</strong> cotton in Thail<strong>and</strong> such as the<br />

DBM lleliothis<strong>and</strong> Spodoptera exigua, research to strengthen our knowledge of<br />

pesticide resistance must be emphasized. It is impractical to consider a regular<br />

alternation with new insecticides as the solution to the present situation. As a<br />

matter of fact, it is probably difficult to introduce alternative insecticides with no<br />

known cross resistance when insects already show resistance to certain<br />

insecticides. Miyata et al. (1985) discussed the use of synergists to delay the rate<br />

of resistance development but, so far, an effective synergist to overcome

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!