05.12.2012 Views

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

and Integrated Pest Management - part - usaid

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 PI-S'IlCIDE MANAGIEMENT AND 1PM IN SOUIIIEAST ASIA<br />

Table 2. Order of importance of rice pests in Indonesia based on cumulative<br />

weights of infestation for 1979-1985.<br />

Rice pest Cumulative weighta<br />

of infestation<br />

intensity<br />

Order of<br />

importance<br />

Brown plnthopper (BPH) 29,750,729 1<br />

Rat<br />

Rice stemborer<br />

21,268,828<br />

11,302,015<br />

2<br />

3<br />

Leaf folder/leaf roller 6,770,431.4 4<br />

Rice bug<br />

Army worm<br />

Rice gall midge<br />

Stink bug<br />

Green stink bug<br />

Wild pig<br />

5,116,307.6<br />

4,142,039.2<br />

1,427,661.2<br />

1,017,403.2<br />

353,530.1<br />

347,869.2<br />

aCumulative weight of infestation intensity = area infested x intensity<br />

area infested<br />

targets for these commodities so far have not been met, one reason being that as<br />

the programs are being implemented, pest problems have increased, <strong>part</strong>icularly<br />

in rice (Table 2).<br />

To cope with pest problems, Indonesia used to rely on the "single control<br />

technique" approach, which employs either resistant varieties or intensive<br />

chemical sprays. This approach seemed to be disadvantageous as it brought<br />

about tile occurrence of biotypes, pest resistance, <strong>and</strong> resurgence.<br />

The <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Pest</strong> <strong>Management</strong> (IPM) or <strong>Integrated</strong> <strong>Pest</strong> Control (IPC)<br />

approach was then introduced <strong>and</strong> developed in ,ie1970s. Nevertheless,<br />

implementation of this approach in operational terms could not be smoothly<br />

(lone. There were constraints, which were more institutional <strong>and</strong> peceptional<br />

than technical in nature, until a breakthrough was made with the issuance of the<br />

Presidential Instruction known as Inpres no. 3 1986. This instruction made IPM<br />

a national policy <strong>and</strong> strategy for crop protection. It stipulated the utilization of<br />

natural enemies, cropping patterns, <strong>and</strong> resistant varieties as the major<br />

comxnents of control. <strong>Pest</strong>icides could only be applied on a need basis to avoid<br />

undesirable impact on natural enemies, or on resistance, resurgence, <strong>and</strong><br />

environmental pollution.<br />

1PM INFRASTRUCTURE<br />

The government has organized a number of institutes to implement its crop<br />

protection progralns, <strong>and</strong> these are:<br />

1. At the Central level: the Directorate of Food Crop Protection, which is<br />

responsible for the formulation of national policy, strategy <strong>and</strong> program, <strong>and</strong><br />

,orsupervising <strong>and</strong> providing guidance during implementation.<br />

5<br />

6<br />

7<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!