21.09.2015 Views

The Quest for Relevant Air Power

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

PDF - Air University Press - Air Force Link

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GERMAN <strong>Air</strong> Force │ 153<br />

and actual operational requirements, did the newly elected defence<br />

minister, Peter Struck, deem it indispensable to undertake<br />

significant adjustments of the military re<strong>for</strong>m. This process started<br />

in late 2002 and resulted in the 2003 Defence Policy Guidelines. 11<br />

<strong>The</strong> guidelines can be understood as a fundamental change in<br />

paradigms towards a more proactive defence policy, where out-ofarea<br />

operations are the core business of Germany’s armed <strong>for</strong>ces.<br />

As such, Struck’s adjustments were in fact a re<strong>for</strong>m in their own<br />

right. With the conservatives winning the elections of 2005, Franz<br />

Josef Jung, the new defence minister, released the White Paper<br />

2006: German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr. It<br />

not only reiterated the importance of deployed operations but also<br />

emphasised the territorial defence of Germany against external<br />

threats as the German armed <strong>for</strong>ces’ raison d’être and core function,<br />

thus partially reversing Struck’s re<strong>for</strong>m. 12 In October 2009,<br />

Karl-<strong>The</strong>odor zu Guttenberg became the new German defence<br />

minister. Despite being a member of a conservative party, as was<br />

his predecessor, Guttenberg intends to embark upon the most farreaching<br />

re<strong>for</strong>m of the post–Cold War era. While the exact corollaries<br />

of this re<strong>for</strong>m cannot yet be grasped (up to this writing),<br />

they will most likely result in smaller armed <strong>for</strong>ces better suited<br />

<strong>for</strong> deployed operations. As such, potential <strong>for</strong>ce reductions are<br />

alluded to in this chapter.<br />

Threat and Risk Perception. <strong>The</strong> 1992 Defence Policy Guidelines,<br />

published on 26 November, identified recent changes on the<br />

European continent as irreversible. <strong>The</strong> reunification of Germany,<br />

the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, and the democratisation in<br />

Eastern Europe laid a solid basis <strong>for</strong> a process of which Germany<br />

was the main beneficiary. <strong>The</strong> country was no longer in the direct<br />

vicinity of an opposing military alliance but surrounded by allies<br />

and partners. <strong>The</strong> guidelines argued that, <strong>for</strong> the <strong>for</strong>eseeable future,<br />

Russia had neither the rationale nor the economic and military<br />

potential to wage a large-scale offensive against NATO. Provided<br />

there was the capacity <strong>for</strong> a flexible reconstitution of Western<br />

armed <strong>for</strong>ces, a full-scale invasion was not conceivable without at<br />

least one year of warning time. While Central Europe could benefit<br />

from immense improvements, internal conflicts and collapsing<br />

states as well as the proliferation of WMDs at the European periphery<br />

were perceived to be serious challenges. <strong>The</strong> increased inter-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!